W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2018

Re: NVDA /FF vs NVDA/Chrome

From: Mhis-Archiv <haunschild@mhis.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:22:14 +0200
Message-Id: <11B62AF6-6C73-4434-A172-CA0D7E31774F@mhis.de>
Cc: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hey there,

if you don’t need a discussion, but a brief answer, maybe you should contact Marco Zehe on Twitter. He works for Mozilla and uses NVDA (he is blind).

Maybe you find some answers in his blog at www.marcozehe.de

Hope this helps, sorry, I can’t answer your questions myself.

Here is a link to Marcos Twitter account:

https://mobile.twitter.com/MarcoInEnglish?ref_src=twsrc%5Eappleios%7Ctwcamp%5Esafari%7Ctwgr%5Eprofile

--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Marc Haunschild
www.mhis.de





--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Marc Haunschild
www.mhis.de
> Am 26.07.2018 um 17:04 schrieb ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com>:
> 
> Sirisha,
>  
> Did you ever get a response from this group?
>  
> Alan Smith
>  
> From: sirisha gubba
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 4:20 PM
> To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Subject: NVDA /FF vs NVDA/Chrome
>  
> I have a question about why NVDA in FF browser is recommend even though Chrome and FF uses same API.  As per WEBAIM screen reader usage survey shows NVDA with FF is used more.
>  
> Also can you please tell which browser builds better accessibility tree?
>  
>  
>  
> Thanks,
> Siri
>  

Received on Thursday, 26 July 2018 16:22:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:37:20 UTC