- From: Bim Egan <bim.egan1@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 09:57:35 -0000
- To: "'Srinivasu Chakravarthula'" <lists@srinivasu.org>, <chagnon@pubcom.com>
- Cc: "'w3c WAI List'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <01BD5D3DE8034DE5AC2CB743D2FD2C3E@bimlaptop>
Agreed! It deserves a +100. Bim ------------- Bim Egan Skype: bim.accessequals Coordinator: Describe Online W: www.describe-online.com E: bim <mailto:bim@describe-online.com> @describe-online.com Partner: AccessEquals W: www.accessequals.com E: bim.egan@accessequals.com _____ From: Srinivasu Chakravarthula [mailto:lists@srinivasu.org] Sent: 02 March 2018 08:55 To: chagnon@pubcom.com Cc: w3c WAI List Subject: Re: WCAG vialations or accessibility enhancements Very well said! Thank you... Regards, Srinivasu Chakravarthula - Twitter: http://twitter.com/CSrinivasu/ Website: http://www.srinivasu.org | http://serveominclusion.com Let's create an inclusive web! Lead Accessibility Consultant, Informatica On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:42 PM, <chagnon@pubcom.com> wrote: I'm just a lurker on this list, but I'm a member on other accessibility standards committees. This issue of non-sequential (or out-of-order) headings has become a heated debate everywhere and I believe it's a terrible trend. It certainly violates, in principal, the concept of making digital media accessible to people. Writing, editing, publishing - regardless of the media that delivers it - has always stressed a logical hierarchy of headings and that theory has worked well over the past 100 years of communication. It's called good writing. I don't understand what has brought about this change in thought on all the standards committees, that it's OK to jump from H2 to H5. It is not ok. It harms many people who use assistive technologies. What's happened to our commitment to those of us who use assistive technologies, who depend upon them? Does the community's needs no longer have any merit? During the past couple of years, those of us on standards committees seem to have put the cart before the horse. Our standards are developed for people who use technology - not for the computers or technologies that deliver the content. Otherwise, we are just wasting our time developing any accessibility standards at all. Peoples' need first. Then it's the software engineers' job to make their technology meet those needs. -Bevi Chagnon - - - Bevi Chagnon, founder/CEO | <mailto:Bevi@PubCom.com> Bevi@PubCom.com - - - PubCom: Technologists for Accessible Design + Publishing consulting . training . development . design . sec. 508 services Upcoming classes at www.PubCom.com/classes - - - _____ <http://www.avg.com/internet-security> AVG logo This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/internet-security>
Received on Friday, 2 March 2018 09:58:32 UTC