- From: Andrew Cunningham <andj.cunningham@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 14:33:39 +1100
- To: Userite <richard@userite.com>
- Cc: "Subramanian, Poornima (PCL)" <psubramanian@hagroup.com>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOUP6KkabD-FJsStFS0G5LjL_LnsRnWuvuPxo-v+6VB+AseaWA@mail.gmail.com>
Although for some languages and scripts underlining text has semantic meaning and may represent something other than a link. So underlining by itself is likewise a less than desireable way of indicating the presence of a link. Likewise underlining can obscure diacritics below a base character impacting on legibility of text. So skipping ink or positioning underline sufficiently below text may be concerns although this In turn may require adjustments to leading . Andrew On Sunday, 28 January 2018, Userite <richard@userite.com> wrote: > Hi Poornima, > There definitely needs to be some TEXTUAL differentiation if the link text > is within a text part of the page, you must not rely simply on a change of > colour. – However if the link is part on a clearly defined navigation menu > it does not need textual identification because the context already makes > it clear that it is a link. > > So for your problem you need to decide if the list of links is obvious > from its context. If your page says something like “Here is a list of > links to useful info” and is immediately followed by a numbered or bulleted > list then you could probably get away without the need to underline the > text in each list item. Your designer is probably correct in saying that a > block of underlined list items looks too cumbersome. To be safe though I > would suggest that you underline the call to action but leave the rest of > the link text not underlined. > > Another option is to include an HTML arrow at the end of the link (try > » or » ) > > Clear identification of link text is essential for WCAG compliance. > > Regards > > Richard > > www.website-accessibility.com > > *From:* Subramanian, Poornima (PCL) <psubramanian@hagroup.com> > *Sent:* Friday, January 26, 2018 10:10 PM > *To:* w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > *Subject:* Differentiating links from normal text > > > Hi, I would appreciate any design suggestion regarding “differentiating > links from normal text” for the below scenario - > > > > I was aware the WCAG recommendations on the links (i) no use of color > alone for links (ii) highlight links in different formatting while in > blocks of text > > > > In one of our test pages, there is a list of items with each item shows > the title, date, a call-to-action button (designed together as a link). > Here, the page contain mostly links in the form of list items. > > > > And, the designers think underlining the links will make it look > cumbersome visually. > > > > Couple of questions – > > > > 1. Any design suggestions on how the links can be differentiated in > this example to make it compliant? (e.g. bold, underline the title) > > 2. Is underlining or differentiating the links must or nice-to-have > for WCAG compliance? > > > > Best, > > Poornima > > > > *Accessibility Tester & Consultant* > > > The information contained in this email and any attachment may be > confidential and/or legally privileged and has been sent for the sole use > of the intended recipient. If you are not an intended recipient, you are > not authorized to review, use, disclose or copy any of its contents. If you > have received this email in error please reply to the sender and destroy > all copies of the message. Thank you. > > To the extent that the matters contained in this email relate to services > being provided by Princess Cruises and/or Holland America Line (together > "HA Group") to Carnival Australia/P&O Cruises Australia, HA Group is > providing these services under the terms of a Services Agreement between HA > Group and Carnival Australia. > -- Andrew Cunningham andj.cunningham@gmail.com
Received on Monday, 29 January 2018 03:34:02 UTC