- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 00:48:04 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 03/01/18 00:21, Steve Green wrote: > That's not correct. According to the references below, unilateral NDAs may (but may not) need to be executed as a deed but bilateral NDAs do not. > > https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/non-disclosure-agreements/non-disclosure-agreements > http://www.seqlegal.com/questions/do-ndas-need-be-witnessed It does seem to say, when in doubt, use a deed, as it is easy to do, and "may not be enforceable" otherwise, if the agreement is one sided. It advises against artificial attempts to make it mutual. Certainly the only non-disclosure agreement I remember signing (a personal one, direct with the client, when I was working for a client as an employee of a software house) was done as a deed. That was one sided, because the client was free to use anything I disclosed.
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2018 00:49:10 UTC