- From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 13:20:14 -0700
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Cc: W3C WAI ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2018 20:21:15 UTC
Felix's examples work well at 320 CSS px. I just tried them. Chrome, x500%, my resolution 1600x900. Wayne On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:21 AM Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > On 26/06/2018 01:46, Felix Miata wrote: > [...] > > If you don't believe me, take a look inside these two very simple > examples I > > made many moons ago and have not since touched: > > > > http://fm.no-ip.com/Auth/Sites/dlviolin.html > > http://fm.no-ip.com/Auth/Sites/Ksc/ > > > > All the design-side solutions and workarounds I've seen for text size > problems, > > including in particular "responsive design", to me look like _literally_ > trying > > to push rope. > > For what it's worth, your two example sites are near enough unusable on > small-screen/mobile devices. Maybe that rope should have been pushed a > little bit further with media queries (aka "responsive design). > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke > http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > >
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2018 20:21:15 UTC