W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2018

RE: Font accessibility

From: Karlen Communications <info@karlencommunications.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:24:59 -0400
To: "'Jonathan Avila'" <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>, "'Gian Wild'" <gian@accessibilityoz.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <004201d40a24$0a25b210$1e711630$@karlencommunications.com>
I can chime in - I have difficulty reading sans-serif fonts because I can't
distinguish letter combinations like dl - to me it appears as a single
letter if the ligatures are not present. I also find thin fonts, even if
serif, difficult to read. Visually, they seem to blend into the background
too much. It is kind of like trying to see a twig in the grass versus a


Cheers, Karen


From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com> 
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 11:09 PM
To: Gian Wild <gian@accessibilityoz.com>; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: RE: Font accessibility


I can't provide you proof but I can speak from personal experience that thin
line fonts are much harder for me to read.  Overly bold fonts are a problem
as well because the shape of the letter then is harder to distinguish.




From: Gian Wild <gian@accessibilityoz.com <mailto:gian@accessibilityoz.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 4:59 AM
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org <mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> 
Subject: Font accessibility




Does anyone have some research or evidence about the accessibility of
different fonts? We have come across a very thin-lined font and we have been
asked for proof that it is harder to read than normal font.





(Sorry for cross-posting)


Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef> 
Received on Friday, 22 June 2018 12:25:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:37:17 UTC