Re: Another site to consider as a WCAG 2.1 implementation

Great thought though Glenda!

** katie **

*Katie Haritos-Shea*

*Principal ICT Accessibility Architect, **W3C Advisory Committee Rep for
Knowbility *

*WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA/QA/FinServ/FinTech/Privacy,* *IAAP CPACC+WAS = *
*CPWA* <http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/cpwacertificants>

*Cell: **703-371-5545 <703-371-5545>** |* *ryladog@gmail.com
<ryladog@gmail.com>* *| **Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/>*

People may forget exactly what it was that you said or did,
but people will never forget how you made them feel.......

Our scars remind us of where we have been........they do not have to
dictate where we are going.


On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Beranek, Nicholas <
Nicholas.Beranek@capitalone.com> wrote:

> Hey Mark, since this is fresh in my mind as we are preparing for it here
> at Capital One, here is the WCAG 2.1 Implementation Report:
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/implementation-report/
>
>
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> *From: *Mark Weiler <mweiler@alumni.sfu.ca>
> *Reply-To: *Mark Weiler <mweiler@alumni.sfu.ca>
> *Date: *Friday, May 25, 2018 at 11:42 AM
> *To: *"glenda.sims@deque.com" <glenda.sims@deque.com>, Alastair Campbell <
> alastc@gmail.com>
> *Cc: *"w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Re: Another site to consider as a WCAG 2.1 implementation
> *Resent-From: *"w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> *Resent-Date: *Friday, May 25, 2018 at 11:30 AM
>
>
>
> Is there an existing set of implementations that are being reviewed? If
> so, where are they?
>
>
>
> On Friday, May 25, 2018, 11:19:51 a.m. EDT, Alastair Campbell <
> alastc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Glenda,
>
> I'm afraid the implementations are used specifically to progress to
> candidate recommendation, and at this stage we don't have the capasity
> to add & test another one.
>
> What I would suggest is that someone who is confident with the new SCs
> tackle it as a case study and publish the results as a blog post or
> article.
>
> >From a very brief look it seems to be a great site, so should be an
> easy test, and a useful case study.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -Alastair
>
> PS. Was this the email list you intended to send to?
>
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 3:48 AM, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>
> wrote:
> > Andrew, Josh, Alastair,
> >
> > I haven't had a chance to personally review this site, but I do want to
> > submit the winner of this year's OpenAIR 2018 competition for
> consideration
> > as a WCAG 2.1 implementation.
> >
> > The team that built the American Council for the Blind, Nebraska site,
> "The
> > Inclusive Lab" is gung ho to be a WCAG 2.1 implementer.  If someone has
> the
> > time to formally review the site for WCAG 2.1, I'm confident that Michael
> > Fairchild (the lead of the Inclusive Lab team) will be more than willing
> to
> > make sure that this site https://acbnebraska.org/
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__acbnebraska.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=pLULRYW__RtkwsQUPxJVDGboCTdgji3AcHNJU0BpTJE&r=dC_UMEUmMt99VWyKrKPEqTxnbvpXlSbd6mQlzIdMbyICf0SCKN1_f4B400_d3Ziy&m=cvEnDezS0eW7dN_neoBmPdzeBvUE4CiwOcF4PiBd6Sw&s=TY2TugmYoLJN-2OTSFJ_KokWzAaJfJFJUUog3G5BRqg&e=>is
> a shining example of
> > WCAG 2.1.
> >
> > Let me know if you this is a possibility...and I can share Michael
> > Fairchild's contact info with y'all.
> >
> > Peace out,
> > G
> > glenda sims, cpacc  | team a11y lead | 512.963.3773
> >
> >        deque systems  accessibility for good
>
> ------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
> proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used
> solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information
> transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity
> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
> dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any
> action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and
> delete the material from your computer.
>