Re: Another site to consider as a WCAG 2.1 implementation

 Is there an existing set of implementations that are being reviewed? If so, where are they?
    On Friday, May 25, 2018, 11:19:51 a.m. EDT, Alastair Campbell <alastc@gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 Hi Glenda,

I'm afraid the implementations are used specifically to progress to
candidate recommendation, and at this stage we don't have the capasity
to add & test another one.

What I would suggest is that someone who is confident with the new SCs
tackle it as a case study and publish the results as a blog post or
article.

>From a very brief look it seems to be a great site, so should be an
easy test, and a useful case study.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

PS. Was this the email list you intended to send to?


On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 3:48 AM, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com> wrote:
> Andrew, Josh, Alastair,
>
> I haven't had a chance to personally review this site, but I do want to
> submit the winner of this year's OpenAIR 2018 competition for consideration
> as a WCAG 2.1 implementation.
>
> The team that built the American Council for the Blind, Nebraska site, "The
> Inclusive Lab" is gung ho to be a WCAG 2.1 implementer.  If someone has the
> time to formally review the site for WCAG 2.1, I'm confident that Michael
> Fairchild (the lead of the Inclusive Lab team) will be more than willing to
> make sure that this site https://acbnebraska.org/ is a shining example of
> WCAG 2.1.
>
> Let me know if you this is a possibility...and I can share Michael
> Fairchild's contact info with y'all.
>
> Peace out,
> G
> glenda sims, cpacc  | team a11y lead | 512.963.3773
>
>        deque systems  accessibility for good