- From: Chaals Nevile <chaals@yandex.ru>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 15:33:01 +0200
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <op.zhpzxba8nd6f5a@ordhord.home>
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:59:12 +0200, Sean Murphy (seanmmur) <seanmmur@cisco.com> wrote: > > The subject says it all. Has Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 > been officially been released? Quick answer: No, you probably have to wait 6-8 weeks for that, but it probably won't be changing in that time... A longer answer: It hs not been finalied, it is a W3C Candidate Recommendation, meaning the Working Group thinks it is done and are looking for implementation experience. They have basically finished with that phase, and are ready to request that it be a Proposed Recommendation - which means the Working Group is ure they are done, and it is up to the W3C Director to suggest this be released, get feedback from the W3C members, and presumably release it. While it is not formally a done deal at this stage, it is pretty rare for a Proposed Recommendation not to move forward to recommendation. In the normal course of affairs it might be formally released in 6-8 weeks. Again, normally, the spec doesn't change from this point, although it has happened before and is possible. If so, you would also expect to wait longer. My hunch is that this is unlikely, and that in about 8 weeks you can expect a formal release that looks pretty much like what you see today in the spec, but there is still a possibility that it doesn't happen like that. cheeers Chaals > > > Regards > > Sean Murphy > > Accessibility Software ENGINEER > > seanmmur@cisco.com > > Tel: +61 2 8446 7751 > > > Cisco Systems, Inc. > > The Forum 201 Pacific Highway > > ST LEONARDS > > 2065 > > Australia > > cisco.com > > > http://www.cisco.com/go/accessibility > > > Think before you print. > > This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole > use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, >distribution or > disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient (or authorized to receive for the >recipient), please contact > the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. > > http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/legal/terms-sale-software-license-agreement/company-registration-information.html > > > -- Chaals: Charles (McCathie) Nevile find more at https://yandex.com Using Opera's long-abandoned mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ Is there really still nothing better?
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2018 13:33:33 UTC