W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2017

RE: Should Datepickers be treated as a Modal Dialog?

From: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 17:37:09 -0800
To: "'Bolena, Zachary'" <Zachary.Bolena@Schwab.com>, "'Subramanian, Poornima \(PCL\)'" <psubramanian@hagroup.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Cc: "'W3C WAI Interest Group'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <026d01d35f44$9650aa00$c2f1fe00$@gmail.com>
When making a11y decisions, please don't' reference content deleted from the
ARIA authoring Practices. 

 

The file in our repo at:

https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria-practices/master/aria-practices-DeletedSectionsA
rchive.html

contains content that was deleted and we kept it on hand only because it
contains some useful fragments. But, that file contains content that has
significant errors and some guidance that is not recognized as good practice
by the ARIA working group.

 

We will eventually remove that file completely.

 

Thanks,

Matt King

 

From: Bolena, Zachary [mailto:Zachary.Bolena@Schwab.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 6:59 AM
To: Subramanian, Poornima (PCL) <psubramanian@hagroup.com>;
w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Cc: W3C WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Should Datepickers be treated as a Modal Dialog?

 

Hi Poornima,

 

I guess this would be considered a dialog non-modal as it is described as:

 

"A dialog is a small application window that sits above the application and
is designed to interrupt the current processing of an application in order
to prompt the user to enter information or require a response"

 

(https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria-practices/master/aria-practices-DeletedSections
Archive.html#dialog_nonmodal)

 

The content addressing the dialog non-modal on this page seems to be similar
to a modal dialog except hiding the background content does not seem to be
addressed. Perhaps it does not apply so it was not addressed. 

 

I see that this is currently being drafted so I will address it on the
github thread (Draft Dialog (non-Modal) design pattern
<https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/59>   #59). 

 

 

Thank you,
Zach Bolena

 

From: Subramanian, Poornima (PCL) [mailto:psubramanian@hagroup.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 8:43 AM
To: Bolena, Zachary; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org <mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> 
Cc: W3C WAI Interest Group
Subject: RE: Should Datepickers be treated as a Modal Dialog?

 

If you see the ARIA patterns, there are two different widgets: Modal dialog,
Non-modal dialog.

 

http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-practices-1.1/#dialog_nonmodal
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.w3.org_TR_wai-2Dari
a-2Dpractices-2D1.1_-23dialog-5Fnonmodal&d=DwMFAg&c=Ezx-H5PgBrUMEEvxgJuTQRYr
d-4D8l8I18qkZZzJQbo&r=gfIcoH9AOzWzA6hyAsR7zIoc3exAOSNc5ep43e0oO18&m=BaS3kals
7uI8wt0Kh0Pde80KOpxORN8_EcM0J_0XsRU&s=3Dsk3rIIMEu7Qz_Drh3iUtM-EF9fRmv_S9zVHe
bSOD8&e=> 

 

This Non-modal dialog does not fade out the background content (contrast to
what modal does). I think it is of no harm to code the date pickers as
non-modal dialog where the keyboard navigation is possible to the background
content while date picker is open. 

 

It is important that the date picker widget is easy to interpret announcing
its Name, Role, State, Value along with instructions. 

 

Best,

Poornima. 

 

From: Bolena, Zachary [mailto:Zachary.Bolena@Schwab.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 8:55 AM
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org <mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> 
Cc: W3C WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org <mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> >
Subject: Should Datepickers be treated as a Modal Dialog?

 

Hello All,

 

Every example of an "accessible" date picker I have looked at online does
not treat the datepicker as a modal dialog. Is this because it is not a seen
as a modal dialog but rather a specific task based widget? Should the
datepicker container <div> take on the same characteristics as a modal such
as hiding the background from screen readers when the datepicker calendar is
active? 

 

 

Thank you,
Zachary Bolena
Senior Manager of Accessibility for User Experience 
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

 

"Great innovators fall in love with the problem, not the solution."

NOTICE: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate email system
is subject to archiving, monitoring and/or review by Schwab personnel.

 


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.symanteccloud.com&d
=DwMFAg&c=Ezx-H5PgBrUMEEvxgJuTQRYrd-4D8l8I18qkZZzJQbo&r=gfIcoH9AOzWzA6hyAsR7
zIoc3exAOSNc5ep43e0oO18&m=BaS3kals7uI8wt0Kh0Pde80KOpxORN8_EcM0J_0XsRU&s=0Tcv
9nJYPoHsYU4va3TLgc8ltvmOinFdRZLcKhK-T64&e=> 
______________________________________________________________________

The information contained in this email and any attachment may be
confidential and/or legally privileged and has been sent for the sole use of
the intended recipient. If you are not an intended recipient, you are not
authorized to review, use, disclose or copy any of its contents. If you have
received this email in error please reply to the sender and destroy all
copies of the message. Thank you. 

To the extent that the matters contained in this email relate to services
being provided by Princess Cruises and/or Holland America Line (together "HA
Group") to Carnival Australia/P&O Cruises Australia, HA Group is providing
these services under the terms of a Services Agreement between HA Group and
Carnival Australia. 
Received on Friday, 17 November 2017 01:37:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 6 December 2017 16:04:47 UTC