- From: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 20:21:33 -0700
- To: "'Sean Murphy \(seanmmur\)'" <seanmmur@cisco.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <082901d29e04$69d96b80$3d8c4280$@gmail.com>
Sean, I strongly believe this should be a design decision. There are many factors that could play into what is optimal. For composite widgets that employ ARIA, the authoring practices task force is working on addressing these factors for various design patterns. None of this is normative, and that is intentional. WCAG should be careful not to be too specific with respect to focus movement in dynamic pages. Instead, it should refer designers and developers to guidance, like the ARIA Authoring Practices, that explains factors to consider when designing a focus sequence. Matt King From: Sean Murphy (seanmmur) [mailto:seanmmur@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 6:45 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Auto focus movement with dynamic updates All, I have reviewed 2.4.3, 3.2.2 and 3.2.5 and need verification for web sites that use dynamic content after an action has been initiated on an input element like a link, button, treeivew node, tab strip, etc. After the page has dynamically updated, should the focus move? This is not related to automatic focus movement within a form which is covered by 2.4.3. The actions are: 1. User moves keyboard focus on to an element. Such as a tree view sub-node or a link. 2. They press enter to activate the item. 3. The same page dynamically updates showing new content. The main navigation elements still exist. 4. The focus moves to the first element on the new content shown. My feeling the above is incorrect and if so, not sure which WCAG SC would apply. Comments? Sean
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2017 03:22:07 UTC