- From: Wayne Dick <waynedick@knowbility.org>
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:22:08 -0800
- To: Juliette <piazza.juliette@gmail.com>
- Cc: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAC9gL75EJgCTpRCqW5BB+HaPeQ1VMXi=ih=r-re7zycfzBcMpw@mail.gmail.com>
This is a critical enterprise. There are others that are similar. In all these cases I have started to worry about the ethical treatment of human subjects. How do you address this? Sincerely, Wayne Dick On Saturday, February 25, 2017, Juliette <piazza.juliette@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > I launched, Inclusight, a startup that provides disabled participants for user testings. After providing for a while, disabled participants for face-to-face user testing, I figured out this was not the best solution. It's not convenient at all for disabled people as they need to travel and to plan the session a long time in advance. And when they start the testing, they figure out they cannot use their own familiar configurations. It's also a pain for user researchers who, on top of that, are not always aware of how is it to work with disabled people. > That's how I came up with the ambition of offering remote usability testings for disabled people. At this stage, I am looking for professionals willing to share with me their experience in doing remote user testing with vulnerable or disabled people. I want to understand how you could make the most benefit from Inclusight. > I am looking forward to hearing from user researchers, web accessibility experts or any other professionals. > Kind Regards, > -- > Juliette >
Received on Saturday, 25 February 2017 20:48:18 UTC