W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2017

RE: documenting best practice?

From: Lovely, Brian (CONT) <Brian.Lovely@capitalone.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:29:09 +0000
To: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net>, Kelly Childs <kelly@schoolwebmasters.com>
CC: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CO1P103MB00406F9D22D85AC9CA68FB61EE710@CO1P103MB0040.NAMP103.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
If this shows up twice, I apologize.

If you are talking about an image wrapped in an anchor, then Text Alternatives for Active Images (1.1.1.a). If you are talking about just an anchor, Name, Role, Value (4.1.2.a). I'm using WCAG 2.0 AA

-----Original Message-----
From: Karen Lewellen [mailto:klewellen@shellworld.net] 
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 1:20 PM
To: Kelly Childs <kelly@schoolwebmasters.com>
Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: documenting best practice?

no,
I am looking for documents that articulate that this is needful and why.


On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Kelly Childs wrote:

> Are you looking for an example of a better alt attribute? You can use 
> an aria-label on the link to have it say something besides "click here."
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Karen Lewellen 
> <klewellen@shellworld.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>> While I understand that it is best practice for example not to use 
>> the words "click here," in a site alt tag,  a requirement that links 
>> have alt-tabs at all, I am wondering if anyone can direct me to a 
>> specific document?
>> Something I can share reflecting these ideas?
>> Thanks,
>> Karen
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> *Kelly Childs*
> *ADA Compliance & Graphic Support Manager*
>
> [image: Visit School Webmasters Social Sites] 
> <http://www.schoolwebmasters.com/Contact_Us>
>

________________________________________________________

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.
Received on Friday, 20 January 2017 18:30:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 20 January 2017 18:30:56 UTC