- From: Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 22:31:29 -0400
- To: Brian Stevens <bstevens@ilsworld.com>
- Cc: IG - WAI Interest Group List list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <4B0D20CD-FFE8-4BD2-9C3B-DCB6F37DAC3F@umd.edu>
Question 1: Does your site fail if the image is at Full Screen? If not — then of course you are ok. If it DOES fail at full screen — and full screen viewing is an option on your page — then the safe thing to do is to place a warning above the video that says "CAUTION: When viewed full screen this video may trigger seizures in people who are photosensitive” [To not put up such a warning is a bit like leaving an open manhole cover without warning barriers - for people who have photosensitive seizure disorders. ] There was the famous incident in Japan where a cartoon sent about ~300 children to the hospital. They then showed the video on the evening news and sent another ~300 to the hospital. And then there was the London Olympics Promotion video... Question 2: If it does fail at full screen - what is it that fails? The Trace R&D Center Photosensitive Epilepsy Analysis Tool will show you exactly where it fails. There are a number of things that can be done to a video that fails - so that it will not fail. But it usually is hard to fail the test - and there are ways to change a video very subtly to fix them. g Gregg C Vanderheiden greggvan@umd.edu > On May 11, 2017, at 9:54 PM, Brian Stevens <bstevens@ilsworld.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > Some of my company's animated videos fail Success Criteria 2.3.1, but only in the optional full screen mode (as provided automatically > with HTML5 video). At the default size, as they are presented, the videos pass. > > We're using the Trace Center Photosensitive Epilepsy Analysis Tool ( PEAT ) (Version 1.6). The PEAT User Guide says to "Test > out multimedia at the size that it will appear on your web site. E.g., if a video will be presented in a small window rather than a full screen mode, then test it at the smaller size." > > I just wanted to be sure, would this mean developers are not responsible for full screen > mode for 2.3.1? > > The only related documentation in the WCAG I could find that mentions viewing modes > is in Technique G176, where it says "Users with lower resolution displays or that enlarge or view their screens closely would have a higher risk depending > on the viewing distance. To address the needs of this group, G19: > Ensuring that no component of the content flashes more than three times in any 1-second period <https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20161007/G19.html> should be used since it is independent of screen > resolution or viewing distance." > This is basically almost saying that accommodating unpredictable resizing is covered > by Success Criteria 2.3.2 instead, which is Level AAA. Does that include a full screen mode offered by the site itself? > > Sorry if I am answering my own questions, I just wanted to know definitively. Thanks!! > > > Brian Stevens
Received on Friday, 12 May 2017 02:32:09 UTC