- From: (unknown charset) Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 11:28:41 -0400 (EDT)
- To: (unknown charset) "Wright, Isaiah" <Isaiah.Wright@ally.com>
- cc: (unknown charset) Chaals is Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1705101124230.17500@server2.shellworld.net>
Good morning, I understand from a jaws user that in the settings there is information both in percentage and words per minute. I am curious though what you hope your associates will learn from this information? It is an established scientific fact, consult the book 20/20 is not enough for example, that the brain can process faster from listening than from visual reading because there are fewer perception filters to overcome. additionally, I am told the jaws information is for its own internal synthesizer. It is unclear how those numbers shift if using a different synthesizer source. Karen On Wed, 10 May 2017, Wright, Isaiah wrote: > Hi Charles, > > Thank you for replying. I will be presenting an accessibility presentation at my company next week and I’d like to show audio/video examples of screen readers being used at different rates. Preferably, examples of low, medium, and high rates. > > Currently I’m making my own screen recordings using NVDA but I’m having troubles gauging rates and what falls into low, medium, or high categories, especially since there isn’t a rate percentage to WPM conversion chart. > > Cheers, > Isaiah M. Wright > Usability Research | Integrated Channels & Experience > 440 S. Church St., Charlotte NC 28202 > T + 704 444 4694 | isaiah.wright@ally.com > [image001.gif] > > From: Chaals is Charles McCathie Nevile [mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru] > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 5:11 AM > To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Subject: Re: Screen Readers | Rate = Words Per Minute > > > What do you mean by "examples"? > > I know people who use screen readers occasionally, e.g. for testing, at rates under 200 wpm, and others who generally use rates between 400 and 600. > > Or do you just want to know roughly what x% means in wpm - if so, the easiest thing might be to get a stopwatch and a piece of text of a known number of words... > > If nothing appears, I guess I could publish this information somewhere > > cheers > On 09/05/17 16:51, Wright, Isaiah wrote: > I’m looking for examples of screen readers being used at different rates. > > I’ve read that experienced users often like to speed up the reading rate to 300 words per minute or more and that when many people hear a screen reader for the first time, at the normal rate of about 180 words per minute, they complain that it reads too quickly. > > I have access to NVDA but the rate is by percentage instead of words per minute. Is there a chart out there that translates rate percentage into words per minute? > > Cheers, > Isaiah M. Wright > Usability Research | Integrated Channels & Experience > 440 S. Church St., Charlotte NC 28202 > T + 704 444 4694 | isaiah.wright@ally.com<mailto:isaiah.wright@ally.com> > [image001.gif] > > > > -- > > Charles McCathie Nevile - standards - Yandex > > chaals@yandex-team.ru<mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru> - Find more at http://yandex.com >
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2017 15:29:10 UTC