- From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
- Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 03:09:23 +0000
- To: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> An equivalent alternative here would be to provide a link to the feed on twitter.com itself. It means an extra click/tap, but users on small viewport would still be able to get to those tweets (just not directly embedded in the page itself). In order to satisfy the requirement for the alternative to be on the same page I wonder if a pop-up on the same page containing only the twitter feeds with the other content aria-hidden would be a better solution. Jonathan Avila Chief Accessibility Officer SSB BART Group jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com 703.637.8957 (Office) Visit us online: Website | Twitter | Facebook | Linkedin | Blog Join SSB at Accessing Higher Ground This Month! -----Original Message----- From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 5:31 AM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: How 1.4.4 Resize text applies when mobile templates kick in On 03/11/2016 02:36, Matthew Putland wrote: > Something like an embedded twitter feed could be removed on mobile to > prevent touch-screen users from getting stuck in a massive list of > tweets. Sure, the twitter feed could fit in the mobile viewport, but > it may not work too well on mobile, so they remove it. I never liked > those horrible huge embedded twitter feeds anyway! An equivalent alternative here would be to provide a link to the feed on twitter.com itself. It means an extra click/tap, but users on small viewport would still be able to get to those tweets (just not directly embedded in the page itself). P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Saturday, 5 November 2016 03:10:00 UTC