W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2016

Re: Implicit labels

From: Mike Elledge <melledge@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:17:17 +0000 (UTC)
To: "Paul J. Adam" <paul.adam@deque.com>, "Balusani, Shirisha" <sirib@uillinois.edu>
Cc: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1269302509.147745.1471886237741.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Hi Paul and Siri--
Why is the example considered an implicit label?
Mike
 

    On Monday, August 22, 2016 12:26 PM, Paul J. Adam <paul.adam@deque.com> wrote:
 

 I would say that’s outdated information. I don’t know of any screen readers that don’t support wrapped labels. 
Maybe there’s a bug with Dragon but it should be fixed if so. 

Paul J. Adam
Accessibility Evangelist 
www.deque.com

On Aug 22, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Balusani, Shirisha <sirib@uillinois.edu> wrote:
To be more clear: The HTML and XHTML specifications allow both implicit and explicit labels. However, some assistive technologies do not correctly handle implicit labels (for example, <label>First name <input type="text" name="firstname"></label>).Is that still true or is it outdated information? _____________________________________________
From: Balusani, Shirisha 
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 10:58 AM
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: Implicit labels  Is implicit labelling is supported by all screen readers in all browsers? Do we have to use for and id along with the implicit labels to make sure that the element tied to label is read by all AT users? ThanksSiri



  
Received on Monday, 22 August 2016 17:20:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 22 August 2016 17:20:42 UTC