Re: SVG 2 review request from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2016-08-12 (w3c-wai-ig@w3.org from July to September 2016)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 14:58:12 -0700
To: David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>
Cc: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>, Rich Morin <rdm@cfcl.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, Nikos Andronikos <Nikos.Andronikos@cisra.canon.com.au>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBJ_HzhzqX0L6ELZBBLShhjnJO4mykWjh9pdGSCigs-jw@mail.gmail.com>

Diversion, but...

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:33 PM, David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net> wrote:
> I think the Working Group’s willingness to consider interactivity in SVG
> inside HTML <img> [reference to previous discussions on listserv]

Uh, this will never happen. Interactive SVG is already easily possible
in HTML via <iframe> or <object>.  <img> already has a
decently-defined processing model that eliminates any possibility of
interactivity.

~TJ

Received on Friday, 12 August 2016 21:59:04 UTC