- From: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 20:10:37 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-Id: <OFE6C30CD6.228E7C5C-ON86257FEE.00058F5C-86257FEE.00067778@notes.na.collabserv.c>
I think I agree with Siri, with some clarification: Buttons and Links *should" have different functionality, and should always be labeled consistently to conform to SC 3.2.4. and I recommend a "failure technique" be added that explains this. My example: a button labeled "Cancel" and a link text "Cancel" are labeled the same, could actually have similar results (but shouldn't), but will confuse the end user thinking that there is, or more importantly, there will be a different results between the button and the link. The end user will think (should think?) the cancel link will jump to the cancel explanation, while the cancel button will actually preform the cancel function on the page or app. ___________ Regards, Phill Jenkins, Senior Engineer & Business Development Executive IBM Research - IBM Accessibility www.linkedin.com/in/philljenkins ibm.com/able facebook.com/IBMAccessibility twitter.com/IBMAccess ageandability.com
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2016 01:11:15 UTC