W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2015

What's everyone's view on backwards-support, etc for ARIA

From: Oscar Cao <oscar.cao@live.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:39:44 +1100
Message-ID: <DUB405-EAS83E6E98C20C8753FFFAFA38C140@phx.gbl>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>


Just skimming through the draft for ARIA in HTML
<https://specs.webplatform.org/html-aria/webspecs/master/>  and I noticed it
says web devs shouldn't use ARIA ROLES to specify the role of an element
which already has that role implied via its native semantics. E.g. <nav


Cannot remember which article it was that said, even though we're using
semantic mark-up we should add in the ARIA roles for older AT that does not
support the new semantic mark-up, since it does no harm, as the role is
still the same.


So what's everyone on this mailing lists' point of view on this?



Received on Thursday, 26 February 2015 04:40:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:51 UTC