W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2015

RE: PDF accessibility guidelines. WAS: Re: PDF's and Signatures

From: Howard Leicester <howard_leicester@btconnect.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 19:04:45 +0000
To: 'Duff Johnson' <duff@duff-johnson.com>, 'Adam Cooper' <cooperad@bigpond.com>
CC: 'WAI Interest Group' <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EEF601AA9ED34DCD9525CDC219DF39B8@H30JC4J>
Please don't change the thread.
I'm looking to see if WAI take it on.
I'm deafblind in the UK and doing my best to get 'accessibility' as central
to healthcare.
I've followed the 'tooings and froings' on PDF etc.
My conclusion, and advice to the british National Health Service is "hold
your guns" it all looks an uncoordinated mess out there.
But! I think WAI may be the best option.
Perhaps we should be more positive constructive and helpful?
Best,
Howard (Kent, UK).


-----Original Message-----
From: Duff Johnson [mailto:duff@duff-johnson.com] 
Sent: 27 January 2015 15:15
To: Adam Cooper
Cc: WAI Interest Group
Subject: Re: PDF accessibility guidelines. WAS: Re: PDF's and Signatures

Hi Adam,

> I'd very much like to continue this discussion, but I'm not sure this is
the right format? Any ideas?

I'm not sure it's the wrong forum; I kind of thought this was a good place
to discuss matters pertaining to web accessibility, and so far as I can tell
the discussion thus far has been very civilized.

Feel free to email me offline you if wish. Or, perhaps start a few thread
specific to your question / concern.

Duff.
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2015 19:05:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:54 UTC