- From: Thad <inclusivethinking@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 20:03:45 -0700
- To: Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com>
- Cc: "SALES, TERRY LYNN" <TERRYLYNN.SALES@cbp.dhs.gov>, "<deborah.kaplan@suberic.net>" <deborah.kaplan@suberic.net>, "<accessys@smart.net>" <accessys@smart.net>, "<kmancuso@gmail.com>" <kmancuso@gmail.com>, "<judyokite@gmail.com>" <judyokite@gmail.com>, "<mark@sadecki.com>" <mark@sadecki.com>, "<w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Genius. You made my day! Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 14, 2014, at 4:06 PM, "Bryan Garaventa" <bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com> wrote: > > Happy to help :) > > To clarify for everybody though, the page I posted is intended to be blank, > with no textual content or visual display at all. This represents a 100% > accessible page that is equally accessible to all people equally regardless > of disability. That may seem like a joke, but this is actually true. > > As soon as you add any textual content or active elements or visual display > to a blank page, you present unavoidable accessibility issues for somebody, > regardless how careful you are about making it accessible. This is why I > wrote the accessibility algorithm, to prove how this works. > > So, it is sort of funny, but it is also totally true. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: SALES, TERRY LYNN [mailto:TERRYLYNN.SALES@cbp.dhs.gov] > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 3:07 PM > To: 'bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com'; 'deborah.kaplan@suberic.net'; > 'accessys@smart.net' > Cc: 'kmancuso@gmail.com'; 'judyokite@gmail.com'; 'mark@sadecki.com'; > 'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org' > Subject: Re: For you: A webpage that is 100% accessible to all people around > the world, regardless of nationality or disability or Assistive Technology > > Bryan, I very much enjoyed and needed the chuckle this evening! Thank you! > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Bryan Garaventa [mailto:bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 05:36 PM Eastern Standard Time > To: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net <deborah.kaplan@suberic.net>; > accessys@smart.net <accessys@smart.net> > Cc: 'Katherine Mancuso' <kmancuso@gmail.com>; 'Judy Okite' > <judyokite@gmail.com>; 'Mark Sadecki' <mark@sadecki.com>; 'WAI Interest > Group' <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > Subject: RE: For you: A webpage that is 100% accessible to all people around > the world, regardless of nationality or disability or Assistive Technology > > When I was a kid, my dad used to ask me 'how do you keep a turkey in > suspense?', which used to annoy me a lot. > > I never did find out the answer... > > -----Original Message----- > From: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net [mailto:deborah.kaplan@suberic.net] > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 2:35 PM > To: accessys@smart.net > Cc: Katherine Mancuso; Judy Okite; Bryan Garaventa; Mark Sadecki; WAI > Interest Group > Subject: Re: For you: A webpage that is 100% accessible to all people around > the world, regardless of nationality or disability or Assistive Technology > > The page is basically a joke, playing on the idea that there is no such > thing as a 100% accessible page; it's blank, with empty HTML source. Given > how many people in the community are viewing on mobile -- or are using > screen readers and are used to theoretically accessible pages that report > nothing back to them -- it's worth being more explicit about why you can't > access the page. :) > > Deborah Kaplan > > >> On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, accessys@smart.net wrote: >> >> >> apparently only if using windows >> >> Bob >> >> >>> On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Katherine Mancuso wrote: >>> >>> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:06:06 -0700 >>> From: Katherine Mancuso <kmancuso@gmail.com> >>> To: Judy Okite <judyokite@gmail.com> >>> Cc: Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com>, >>> Mark Sadecki <mark@sadecki.com>, WAI Interest Group >>> <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> >>> Subject: Re: For you: A webpage that is 100% accessible to all people >>> around the world, regardless of nationality or disability or > Assistive >>> Technology >>> Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 21:06:54 +0000 >>> Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org >>> >>> Functioning as expected. You'll want to "view source" of the page you > get. >>> >>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Judy Okite <judyokite@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> the website is not opening on my end, please... >>>> >>>> Kind Regards, >>>> >>>> *'Chance Favors the prepared mind'* - Louis Pasteur >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Bryan Garaventa < >>>> bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ah, woops??? >>>>> >>>>> You are welcome to add that one in J >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* mark.sadecki@gmail.com [mailto:mark.sadecki@gmail.com] *On >>>>> Behalf Of *Mark Sadecki >>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 14, 2014 1:18 PM >>>>> *To:* Bryan Garaventa >>>>> *Cc:* w3c-wai-ig@w3.org >>>>> *Subject:* Re: For you: A webpage that is 100% accessible to all >>>>> people around the world, regardless of nationality or disability or >>>>> Assistive Technology >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bryan, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This can???t be right. At no point have you even considered the >>>>> reradicating, octally repeating, sesquidecimated equinox factor. >>>>> Once considered, the accessibility percentage should round nicely >>>>> to > 97.82. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Mark >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Bryan Garaventa < >>>>> bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Recently, somebody asked me to show them a website that was 100% >>>>> accessible, so I figured it would make a good experiment. Sort of a >>>>> thought experiment I guess... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So I built a webpage that is 100% accessible to all people in the >>>>> world equally, regardless of nationality, disability type, or >>>>> Assistive Technology used. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Enjoy! It's available at >>>>> >>>>> http://whatsock.com/test/100_percent_accessible.htm >>>>> >>>>> Happy testing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> With this 100% accessible baseline to start from, the accessibility >>>>> percentage for all web technologies everywhere, scales downward to >>>>> account for requisite variables, so that no web technology anywhere >>>>> can be 100% accessible as a result. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To demonstrate this, I also wrote the following algorithm, that >>>>> calculates the general percentage of accessibility for any given >>>>> web technology. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> X = (1 * Disability-Type * Browser-AT * Site-Interactivity * >>>>> Site-Complexity * User-Experience) >>>>> >>>>> P = (Hardware * ((((1 * OS-AT) - X) * Accessibility-Level) + X)) * >>>>> 100 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> P is the general Percentage of accessibility calculated for a >>>>> particular website or web technology feature, which is based on the >>>>> following estimated values for each variable in the formula. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Disability-Type >>>>> >>>>> 0.01: Deaf-Blind + Motor-Impaired >>>>> >>>>> 0.1: Deaf-Blind >>>>> >>>>> 0.2: Deaf + Motor-Impaired >>>>> >>>>> 0.3: Blind + Motor-Impaired >>>>> >>>>> 0.4: Partially Sighted + Motor-Impaired >>>>> >>>>> 0.5: Motor-Impaired >>>>> >>>>> 0.6: Blind >>>>> >>>>> 0.7: Deaf + Partially Sighted >>>>> >>>>> 0.8: Partially Sighted >>>>> >>>>> 0.9: Deaf >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Browser-AT >>>>> >>>>> 1: No AT >>>>> >>>>> 0.98: Internet Explorer + JAWS >>>>> >>>>> 0.93: Internet Explorer + NVDA >>>>> >>>>> 0.95: Firefox + JAWS >>>>> >>>>> 0.98: Firefox + NVDA >>>>> >>>>> 0.95: Safari + VoiceOver >>>>> >>>>> 0.6: Chrome + JAWS >>>>> >>>>> 0.7: Chrome + NVDA >>>>> >>>>> 0.95: Internet Explorer or Firefox or Chrome + Dragon >>>>> >>>>> 0.98: Internet Explorer or Firefox or Chrome + ZoomText >>>>> >>>>> 0.9: Internet Explorer or Firefox or Chrome or Safari + Braille >>>>> Display >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Site-Interactivity >>>>> >>>>> 1: Contains All Static Elements >>>>> >>>>> 0.9: Contains Interactive Features >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Site-Complexity >>>>> >>>>> 1: Simple >>>>> >>>>> 0.95: Medium >>>>> >>>>> 0.9: Complex >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> User-Experience >>>>> >>>>> 1: Advanced >>>>> >>>>> 0.95: Intermediate >>>>> >>>>> 0.9: Beginner >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hardware >>>>> >>>>> 0: None >>>>> >>>>> 1: Computer >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> OS-AT >>>>> >>>>> 0.001: No AT >>>>> >>>>> 0.99: Windows + JAWS >>>>> >>>>> 0.99: Windows + NVDA >>>>> >>>>> 0.99: Windows + Dragon >>>>> >>>>> 0.99: Windows + ZoomText >>>>> >>>>> 0.99: iOS + VoiceOver >>>>> >>>>> 0.99: OS X + VoiceOver >>>>> >>>>> 0.9: Windows or iOS or OS X + Braille Display >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Accessibility-Level >>>>> >>>>> 0.98: Fully Keyboard Accessible + ARIA Standards Compliant (when >>>>> applicable) + WCAG Compliant >>>>> >>>>> 0.3: Fully Keyboard Accessible + ARIA Standards Compliant (when >>>>> applicable) but not WCAG Compliant >>>>> >>>>> 0.3: Fully Keyboard Accessible but not ARIA Standards Compliant >>>>> (when >>>>> applicable) + WCAG Compliant >>>>> >>>>> 0.2: Fully Keyboard Accessible but not ARIA Standards Compliant >>>>> (when >>>>> applicable) nor WCAG Compliant >>>>> >>>>> 0.1: ARIA Standards Compliant (when applicable) but not Fully >>>>> Keyboard Accessible nor WCAG Compliant >>>>> >>>>> 0.01: Neither Fully Keyboard Accessible nor ARIA Standards >>>>> Compliant (when applicable) nor WCAG Compliant >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> (More constants can always be added or adjusted) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> For example: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> (1 * .6 * .95 * .9 * .9 * .9) = 0.41553 >>>>> >>>>> (1 * ((((1 * 0.99) - 0.41553) * .98) + 0.41553)) * 100 = 97.85106 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So roughly calculated, a Blind person(.6) using >>>>> Safari+VoiceOver(.95) accessing a website that Contains Interactive >>>>> Features(.9) that is >>>>> Complex(.9) when the user is a Beginner(.9), >>>>> >>>>> in combination with Hardware(1) that includes iOS+VoiceOver(.99), >>>>> upon a website that is >>>>> >>>>> Fully Keyboard Accessible + ARIA Standards Compliant (when >>>>> applicable) + WCAG Compliant(.98), will have a general >>>>> accessibility Percentage of 97.8. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Like I said, these are just estimates, but I thought it would make >>>>> an interesting experiment. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best wishes, >>>>> >>>>> Bryan > > -- > > > >
Received on Friday, 15 August 2014 03:04:15 UTC