- From: Lukaszek, Amy <alukas@csdm.k12.mi.us>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:28:25 -0500
- To: Ramón Corominas <listas@ramoncorominas.com>
- Cc: Thomas Birch <thomas_birch@ieci.es>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Can you remove me from this list serve. On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Ramón Corominas <listas@ramoncorominas.com> wrote: > Hello, Thomas. > > With the information that you provide, it seems that those infomercials are > just a way of explaining the products and their details in a language that > people finds easier to understand, so I would say they are "alternatives" to > the product details. However, take into account that many deaf people would > also prefer these kind of "easy" explanations, so maybe you are doing it > harder to understand your page (and therefore losing sales). > > Regards, > Ramón. > > Thomas wrote: > >> When validating videos on a web site, we're faced with a question >> regarding captions and criterion 1.2.2. >> First of all, as it states in the Understanding SC 1.2.2 section: "It is >> acknowledged that at the present time there may be difficulty in creating >> captions for time-sensitive material..." >> >> The page we want to validate has a high number of infomercials for many of >> the products that are sold on the page, and we do understand that adding >> captions for all these videos is a big effort. >> >> On the other hand, in the next paragraph of Understanding SC 1.2.2 it >> states that "Captions are not needed when the synchronized media is, itself, >> an alternate presentation of information that is also presented via text on >> the Web page. For example, if information on a page is accompanied by a >> synchronized media presentation that presents no more information than is >> already presented in text, but is easier for people with cognitive, >> language, or learning disabilities to understand, then it would not need to >> be captioned since the information is already presented on the page in text >> or in text alternatives (e.g., for images)". >> >> On each product page that has a corresponding video, people can access all >> the product details that are explained in the video via text, but not >> following the same script that is used in the infomercial (e.g. >> conversations of the actors). Could these videos be considered to be an >> alternative presentation to the product details, or are subtitles always >> required to meet this success criterion in this scenario? > > > -- Mrs. Amy Lukaszek Transition Coordinator & Advisor Crestwood High School alukas@csdm.k12.mi.us 313-274-3751
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2014 12:28:53 UTC