W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 18:38:38 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+ri+VmctvGzv0N90WkZ1M4v00TXqmMOhvo7V9KXZTBUJhAmRw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Elledge <melledge@yahoo.com>
Cc: "WCAG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
found this article/discussion on the same subject from 2012:




HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>

On 6 February 2014 16:37, Mike Elledge <melledge@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hi Everyone--
> I have a question about the use of the DL element.
> HTML5 seems to have broadened the use case for the DL element to include
> occasions where a list would benefit from a built-in descriptive heading
> instead of using <hx> or presenting information in a data table. If used in
> this way, DL provides more flexibility in presenting list items and enables
> screen readers to announce both the heading and list items together, which
> (it seems) would improve both usability and accessibility for persons.
> This is particularly true where, for example, a search returns collections
> of information containing different categories (for example, a list of the
> courses a student is taking, each of which contains information about the
> instructor or instructors, rooms, dates, subject matter, etc.) that could
> be placed in a table, but is more readable when shown in discrete chunks
> (course by course, for example). A tempting way around this is to put text
> within an unordered list, which results in screen readers speaking first
> the heading then the items, but doing this creates invalid code.
> In contrast, WCAG 2.0 limits DL to its HTML4 role as a definition (as in a
> Glossary), which would preclude an expanded use of DL.
> Will WCAG 2.0 be revised to include the more flexible implementation of
> DL, or have I misunderstood DL's re-definition in HTML5?
> Any input about this would be greatly appreciated!
> Best regards,
> Mike Elledge
Received on Sunday, 9 February 2014 18:39:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:46 UTC