W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 15:58:55 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+ri+VkRW3bUifX_yz-D7UzeWgwnmuy=vor6A2WsanbHm1QNjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ramón Corominas <listas@ramoncorominas.com>
Cc: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
On 8 February 2014 14:44, Ramón Corominas <listas@ramoncorominas.com> wrote:

> Or at least in a way that they are understandable and usable by screen
> reader users...?

So far I have only seen anecdotal assertions that definition lists are a
problem for screen reader users, if they are problematic it would be useful
to have some actual data to back this up.

Would it be possible to know how many of this 10% of pages are using
> definition lists *properly*?

I am collecting URLs so that those who are interested can do take  a look.



HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
Received on Saturday, 8 February 2014 16:00:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:50 UTC