Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria

On 06/02/2014 16:37, Mike Elledge wrote:
> In contrast, WCAG 2.0 limits DL to its HTML4 role as a definition (as in
> a Glossary), which would preclude an expanded use of DL.
> Will WCAG 2.0 be revised to include the more flexible implementation of
> DL, or have I misunderstood DL's re-definition in HTML5?

The part that specifically deals with "which markup element should be 
used in HTML", i.e. the techniques, is purely informative 
(non-normative) feel free to ignore the advice there at your 
heart's content if you feel that DL satisfies the (normative) success 
criterion you're addressing (e.g. that the relationship/structure you're 
trying to mark up with the DL is appropriately conveyed in particular to 
AT users).


> Any input about this would be greatly appreciated!
> Best regards,
> Mike Elledge

Patrick H. Lauke
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] | |
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 18:42:01 UTC