w3c-wai-ig@w3.org from January to March 2014 by date

Monday, 31 March 2014

Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers Bryan Garaventa
Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers Bryan Garaventa
Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers Mike Elledge
RE: Dialog behaviour and screen readers Ian Sharpe
Invitation to participate in a research study about "Creating an Inclusive Web Framework" Angela Punshon

Sunday, 30 March 2014

Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers Bryan Garaventa

Saturday, 29 March 2014

Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers Bryan Garaventa
Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers Bryan Garaventa
Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers Bryan Garaventa
RE: Dialog behaviour and screen readers Ian Sharpe
RE: Dialog behaviour and screen readers Ian Sharpe

Friday, 28 March 2014

Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers Bryan Garaventa
Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers Phill Jenkins
Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers Bryan Garaventa
Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers Bryan Garaventa
Dialog behaviour and screen readers Ian Sharpe

Friday, 21 March 2014

Re: Mouse pointer change of state accessibility question Jon Avila
Re: Mouse pointer change of state accessibility question Lorraine Palomino
Mouse pointer change of state accessibility question Christine Kowalski

Thursday, 20 March 2014

WAI-ARIA 1.0 is completed W3C Recommendation Shawn Henry

Monday, 17 March 2014

Web Accessibility Tutorials in Progress Shawn Henry

Tuesday, 11 March 2014

W3C WAI at CSUN 2014 Shawn Henry
WCAG Techniques & Understanding WCAG Updated March 2014 Shawn Henry
RE: implementing Canvas to assure accessibility Steve Faulkner
Re: implementing Canvas to assure accessibility Charles McCathie Nevile

Monday, 10 March 2014

Re: implementing Canvas to assure accessibility Olaf Drümmer
implementing Canvas to assure accessibility Jennifer Sutton

Friday, 7 March 2014

RE: Required Form Fields Question Hays, Keith A
Required Form Fields Question Sailesh Panchang
Re: Required Form Fields Question Gijs Veyfeyken

Thursday, 6 March 2014

RE: Required Form Fields Question Homme, James
RE: Required Form Fields Question Jonathan Avila
RE: Required Form Fields Question Homme, James
Re: Required Form Fields Question Druckman,Geri
Re: Required Form Fields Question Bryan Garaventa
Re: Required Form Fields Question Sailesh Panchang
RE: Required Form Fields Question Jonathan Avila
Re: Required Form Fields Question Bryan Garaventa
Re: Required Form Fields Question Christophe Strobbe
Re: Required Form Fields Question Druckman,Geri
Re: Required Form Fields Question Christophe Strobbe
RE: Required Form Fields Question Jonathan Avila
Required Form Fields Question Homme, James
Re: Using Alt Text on the Link Element Ramón Corominas

Wednesday, 5 March 2014

RE: Using Alt Text on the Link Element David Best
Re: Using Alt Text on the Link Element Bryan Garaventa
RE: Using Alt Text on the Link Element Foliot, John
Re: Using Alt Text on the Link Element Christophe Strobbe
Using Alt Text on the Link Element David Best

Tuesday, 4 March 2014

role heading and attribute aria-level Druckman,Geri

Thursday, 27 February 2014

Re: Captions: Understanding SC 1.2.2 Devarshi Pant
WAI-IG Mailing List reminders Shawn Henry
Re: Captions: Understanding SC 1.2.2 Lukaszek, Amy

Wednesday, 26 February 2014

Re: Captions: Understanding SC 1.2.2 Ramón Corominas
Captions: Understanding SC 1.2.2 Thomas Birch

Monday, 24 February 2014

RE: Success criteria speak for themselves Homme, James
Reminder: comments due Friday 28 February - Call for Review: Pre-Publication Draft of WCAG-EM - Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology Shawn Henry
RE: Success criteria speak for themselves Jonathan Avila

Sunday, 23 February 2014

Re: [WebAIM] Tables with sticky headers Ramón Corominas

Saturday, 22 February 2014

Re: Success criteria speak for themselves - CSS Ramón Corominas
Re: Success criteria speak for themselves Ramón Corominas
RE: Layout Tables With Summary Attributes Jonathan Avila
Re: Layout Tables With Summary Attributes Ramón Corominas

Friday, 21 February 2014

Re: Using Maps Olaf Drümmer
Using Maps Homme, James
Re: Layout Tables With Summary Attributes J. Albert Bowden
RE: Success criteria speak for themselves - CSS Lastort Joanne L [Contractor]
Re: Success criteria speak for themselves - CSS J. Albert Bowden
RE: Success criteria speak for themselves - CSS Lastort Joanne L [Contractor]
RE: Layout Tables With Summary Attributes Bourne, Sarah (ITD)
RE: Success criteria speak for themselves Homme, James
Layout Tables With Summary Attributes Homme, James
RE: Success criteria speak for themselves Bourne, Sarah (ITD)
Re: [WebAIM] Tables with sticky headers Sailesh Panchang
Re: Success criteria speak for themselves Ramón Corominas
Re: Success criteria speak for themselves Ramón Corominas

Thursday, 20 February 2014

Re: Success criteria speak for themselves Ramón Corominas
Re: H43 and header cell relationships J. Albert Bowden
RE: H43 and header cell relationships Homme, James
RE: Success criteria speak for themselves Homme, James
Re: H43 and header cell relationships Pierre Dubois
RE: H43 and header cell relationships Jonathan Avila
Re: H43 and header cell relationships Olaf Drümmer
Re: H43 and header cell relationships Pierre Dubois
RE: H43 and header cell relationships Jonathan Avila
deprecated? was AW: H43 and header cell relationships Brigitte Bornemann
aria-label and aria-labelledby support on images Andrew Kirkpatrick
RE: [WebAIM] Tables with sticky headers Jonathan Avila
Re: [WebAIM] Tables with sticky headers Sailesh Panchang
RE: Success criteria speak for themselves Jonathan Avila
RE: Success criteria speak for themselves Jonathan Avila

Wednesday, 19 February 2014

Re: Success criteria speak for themselves Ramón Corominas
RE: H43 and header cell relationships Tongue, Matt
Re: H43 and header cell relationships Olaf Drümmer
Re: Success criteria speak for themselves Wayne Dick
Re: H43 and header cell relationships Sailesh Panchang
Re: H43 and header cell relationships Olaf Drümmer
H43 and header cell relationships Tongue, Matt
Re: Success criteria speak for themselves Wayne Dick

Tuesday, 18 February 2014

Re: Success criteria speak for themselves Ramón Corominas
Re: Success criteria speak for themselves Jonathan Avila
Re: Success criteria speak for themselves Olaf Drümmer
Success criteria speak for themselves Wayne Dick
RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Homme, James

Monday, 17 February 2014

Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Mike Elledge
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Mike Elledge

Saturday, 15 February 2014

Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Steve Faulkner
RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Jan Eric Hellbusch

Friday, 14 February 2014

Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Duff Johnson
RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Jonathan Avila
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Ramón Corominas
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Frank M. Palinkas
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Duff Johnson
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Steve Faulkner
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Duff Johnson
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Sailesh Panchang
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Duff Johnson
RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Homme, James
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Carlos A Velasco
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Duff Johnson
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Olaf Drümmer
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Ramón Corominas
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Duff Johnson
Re: Call for Review: WCAG 2.0 Techniques Draft Updates Neil King

Wednesday, 12 February 2014

New Accessibility Agreement: WCAG 2.0 AA standard for web and mobile Lainey Feingold

Tuesday, 11 February 2014

RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Homme, James
Reminder: deadline Friday - Call for Review: WCAG 2.0 Techniques Draft Updates Shawn Henry
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Ian Yang

Monday, 10 February 2014

Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Ramón Corominas
Confused by the use of sectioning elements and DL Ian Yang
RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Homme, James
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Ian Yang

Sunday, 9 February 2014

Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Steve Faulkner
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Jorge Fernandes
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Steve Faulkner

Saturday, 8 February 2014

Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Ramón Corominas
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Steve Faulkner
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Ramón Corominas
Definition Lists vs. Data Tables [Was: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria] Ramón Corominas
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Steve Faulkner
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Olaf Drümmer
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Jan Heck

Friday, 7 February 2014

RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Steve Green
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Olaf Drümmer
RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Jan Eric Hellbusch
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Steve Faulkner
RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Steve Green
RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Jan Eric Hellbusch
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Steve Faulkner
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Jan Heck
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Olaf Drümmer
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Ramón Corominas
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Sailesh Panchang
RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Jan Eric Hellbusch
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Ramón Corominas
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Druckman,Geri

Thursday, 6 February 2014

Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Ramón Corominas
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Olaf Drümmer
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Frank M. Palinkas
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Sailesh Panchang
Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Patrick H. Lauke
HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria Mike Elledge
WAI-ARIA 1.0 is Proposed Recommendation Shawn Henry

Friday, 31 January 2014

WebAIM: Loss Aversion and Web Accessibility Jennifer Sutton

Thursday, 30 January 2014

Tuesday, 28 January 2014

W3C WAI at ICCHP - proposals due 1 February Shawn Henry

Monday, 27 January 2014

Friday, 24 January 2014

Incorrect Example Homme, James

Monday, 20 January 2014

Commenting on WCAG via GitHub Andrew Kirkpatrick

Thursday, 16 January 2014

Re: iOS7 voiceover date input issue Mark Sadecki
Call for Review: WCAG 2.0 Techniques Draft Updates Shawn Henry
RE: iOS7 voiceover date input issue Roger Hudson
Re: iOS7 voiceover date input issue Mark Sadecki
iOS7 voiceover date input issue Roger Hudson

Wednesday, 15 January 2014

Re: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? Ramón Corominas

Tuesday, 14 January 2014

Re: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? Bryan Garaventa
Re: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? Ramón Corominas

Friday, 10 January 2014

RE: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? Adam Cooper

Wednesday, 8 January 2014

Re: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? Denis Boudreau
Re: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? Mike Elledge

Tuesday, 7 January 2014

Re: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? Karl Groves
RE: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? Gunderson, Jon R
Re: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? Karl Groves
Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? Mike Elledge
UAAG Review Deadline Extended - Last Call Working Draft of UAAG 2.0 for browsers & other 'user agents' Shawn Henry

Monday, 6 January 2014

Aria-invalid for error indication Sailesh Panchang

Last message date: Monday, 31 March 2014 22:13:32 UTC