Re: Seeking feedback on IAAP certification roadmap

I have wondering for a while why there are rarely classes taught, let alone mandated, for developers when in school in ICT fields. But for folks like me, coming from an advocate/user/compliance side I am looking forward to what I can learn from a certification like this.


This message was sent via cell phone and may contain a spelling error or two.

On Apr 9, 2014, at 6:35 PM, wrote:

> Folks, 
> I agree with Lars' statement: 
> "Surely, we need to ensure that accessibility becomes part of the curriculum where it’s relevant. However, that would involve course development in collaboration with relevant academic institutions rather than a private certification programme." 
> Tony 
> <mime-attachment.jpg>
> Tony Jasionowski 
> Senior Group Manager Accessibility
> Panasonic Consumer Electronics Company 
> Two Riverfront Plaza, 9th Floor 
> Newark, NJ 07102
> Email: 
> Tel/Fax: 201-348-7777 
> <mime-attachment.gif> 
> From:        Lars Ballieu Christensen <> 
> To:        <>, 
> Date:        04/09/2014 03:34 AM 
> Subject:        Re: Seeking feedback on IAAP certification roadmap 
> Hi all, 
> In my opinion …. 
> Coming from a part of the world (Scandinavia) without a string tradition for such certification, I find it difficult to understand what an accessibility certification program would add in terms of improved accessibility. In other areas – coaching, for example – we have seen pseudo-certification programmes where the main reasons appears to be to attempt to keep others out of the business and to generate money from training and certification. Surely, this is not what we want in the accessibility community. 
> In my more than 20 years in the field of digital accessibility, I have very rarely met people who claimed to be accessibility experts without the proper skills and insight. Most practitioners that I have come across have been extremely knowledgeable, and many of us have been extensively involved in policy, legislative and guideline development, formal audits and developer support. 
> Surely, we need to ensure that accessibility becomes part of the corriculum where it’s relevant. However, that would involve course development in collaboration with relevant academic institutions rather than a private certification programme. It seems bizarre that it is possible to complete degree programmes in computer science, information science, digital design and similar without having taken a proper course on accessibility. 
> Venligst/Kind regards 
> Lars 
> ---- 
> Lars Ballieu Christensen 
> Rådgiver/Adviser, Ph.D., M.Sc., Sensus ApS 
> Specialister i tilgængelighed/Accessibility Consultants 
> Tel: +45 48 22 10 03 – Mobil: +45 40 32 68 23 - Skype: Ballieu 
> Mail: – Web: & 
> Vi arbejder for et tilgængeligt og rummeligt informationssamfund 
> Working for an accessible and inclusive information society 
> From: Paul Bohman <>
> Date: tirsdag den 8. april 2014 19.15
> To: <>
> Subject: Seeking feedback on IAAP certification roadmap
> Resent-From: <>
> Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 17:16:20 +0000 
> Cross posted request for feedback: 
> The International Association of Accessibility Professionals (IAAP) needs your feedback on our roadmap for accessibility certification. Here is the roadmap as it stands now:
> We are still in the early stages of designing the certification, so your feedback is most valuable now, before we commit to a certain path.
> Here are some questions to consider as you read the roadmap: 
> 1.        What do you think of the roadmap overall? 
> 2.        What would you do to improve our roadmap? 
> 3.        What do you think of the levels of certification outlined in the roadmap? 
> 4.        Are there any broad Knowledge Domains and Roles that we have left off that should be included? 
> 5.        Do you like our list of Digital Accessibility areas of certification? Should we add to or subtract from this list? (For example, one person commented that we should add gaming to the list.) 
> 6.        Do you like the idea of certifying for these areas separately, in a modular approach as we have done? (See the section on Referencing IAAP Credentials for an explanation of how this might work) 
> 7.        Do you like the 3 year period for certification? Would you make it shorter (2 years) or longer (5 years)? 
> 8.        What kind of certification assessment would you create? Keep in mind that it has to be a valid and meaningful test of the right kind of competencies, it must be challenging enough that novices could not pass it without first studying or gaining experience,  it must be scalable (not too burdensome to administer or grade/score the assessment), and translatable into other languages. 
> 9.        Once certification becomes available, do you think you would go through the process to become certified? Why or why not? 
> 10.        What else should we consider as we move forward?
> To give feedback, you can reply directly to this email, or you can send an email to the certification committee:
> Paul Bohman, PhD
> Chair, IAAP Certification Committee
> Director of Training
> Deque Systems, Inc
> 703-225-0380, ext.121
> <Jasionowski_Tony.vcf>

Received on Thursday, 10 April 2014 05:05:53 UTC