- From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 14:47:33 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, Ramón Corominas <listas@ramoncorominas.com>
Hi Ramón, On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:19:43 +0100, Ramón Corominas <listas@ramoncorominas.com> wrote: > Hi, Chaals and all, > >> For 2.1.3 the requirement is level AAA - for that I consider that you >> have to do a good job, at a high level of efficiency. And I would argue >> that requiring an extra link to be followed essentially breahces the >> "no specific timing" requirement because it is dependent on following >> the link at a specific time when you are connected. > > Following this reasoning, no website with links would meet 2.1.3, since > you need to be connected for them to work. "timing" is not the same as > "time". As I pointed out in the original, I was outlining a highly legalistic argument and not the one I think is fundamentally relevant - but I believe it stands up if you squint right. To be honest, I wouldn't bother explaining it in a real-world situation - if pressed I would give the fuller explanation of my thinking as presented in my email. (Unfortunately my experience suggests that people rarely even aim for level-AAA, and most of those that do don't question individual arguments about whether they have achieved a given requirement, since their claims are really just aspirational, i.e. not conformant to the requirements of a claim, just a badge added to look good). For what it is worth, my argument here relies on the fact that the difference between the scenario of a mouse-only drop-down menu and a normal link is that what can happen is different depending on whether you use mouse or keyboard - the mouse doesn't require a reconnection, the keyboard does. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2013 13:48:05 UTC