- From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 14:47:33 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, Ramón Corominas <listas@ramoncorominas.com>
Hi Ramón,
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:19:43 +0100, Ramón Corominas
<listas@ramoncorominas.com> wrote:
> Hi, Chaals and all,
>
>> For 2.1.3 the requirement is level AAA - for that I consider that you
>> have to do a good job, at a high level of efficiency. And I would argue
>> that requiring an extra link to be followed essentially breahces the
>> "no specific timing" requirement because it is dependent on following
>> the link at a specific time when you are connected.
>
> Following this reasoning, no website with links would meet 2.1.3, since
> you need to be connected for them to work. "timing" is not the same as
> "time".
As I pointed out in the original, I was outlining a highly legalistic
argument and not the one I think is fundamentally relevant - but I believe
it stands up if you squint right. To be honest, I wouldn't bother
explaining it in a real-world situation - if pressed I would give the
fuller explanation of my thinking as presented in my email.
(Unfortunately my experience suggests that people rarely even aim for
level-AAA, and most of those that do don't question individual arguments
about whether they have achieved a given requirement, since their claims
are really just aspirational, i.e. not conformant to the requirements of a
claim, just a badge added to look good).
For what it is worth, my argument here relies on the fact that the
difference between the scenario of a mouse-only drop-down menu and a
normal link is that what can happen is different depending on whether you
use mouse or keyboard - the mouse doesn't require a reconnection, the
keyboard does.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2013 13:48:05 UTC