W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2013

RE: Page length and number of links

From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 08:59:09 -0400
Message-ID: <619f345c49dd23e372ea20cfb16c0c76@mail.gmail.com>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
This is good news that the WCAG WG may consider creating a failure for
endless scrolling!  Skittles.com is a good example of this.

This failure may be a good place to start:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20120103/F16

This sufficient technique could also be used as a bases for a failure.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20120103/SCR33

Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 4:17 PM
To: Patrick H. Lauke; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: RE: Page length and number of links

That's an interesting question.  If you do think that there is a failure
whenever the scripting to load more content on a page is used, we should
have a failure technique for that - anyone who wants to write up a technique
(failure or success types both ok!) can submit the technique at
http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/TECHS-SUBMIT/

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe Systems

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk
http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 3:16 PM
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: Page length and number of links

On 21/06/2013 16:30, deborah.kaplan@suberic.net wrote:
> but I wonder what our
> recommendation from an accessibility standpoint should be about those
> pages which endlessly scroll using JavaScript, without anchors to
> particular places in the page, or the ability to use the back button
> to get back to where you were.

Those likely already violate WCAG 2.0 in different ways, though off the top
of my head I'm not 100% sure which particular SCs. At the very least, there
should be a setting that disabled endless scroll and instead has a button to
"Load more tweets" or whatever dynamically.

P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re-
+ dux, leader; see duke.]

www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com |
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
______________________________________________________________
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
______________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 24 June 2013 12:59:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:49 UTC