W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: sufficient techniques

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 09:24:52 +0100
Message-ID: <515FDBD4.1070804@splintered.co.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 06/04/2013 03:41, Adam Cooper wrote:
> Things I heard recently that I’d really appreciate WAI IG member
> comment/clarification/feedback on:

Any pointers where you've heard those this? Steve already covered 1., 
and 2-4 seem to be fundamentally false / a misunderstanding of the 
actual intent of WCAG 2.0 (that it's about tech-agnostic success criteria).

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]

www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
______________________________________________________________
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
______________________________________________________________
Received on Saturday, 6 April 2013 08:25:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:48 UTC