- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 08:15:51 +0100
- To: Adam Cooper <cooperad@bigpond.com>
- Cc: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 6 April 2013 07:17:00 UTC
Hi Adam, >1. There is an intention to withdraw sufficient techniques relating to code validation from the list; It is my understanding that WCAG 2.0 does not require a valid HTML document, it requires a document with no parsing errors (a subset of validation errors). This[1] may be helpful [1] http://blog.paciellogroup.com/2012/02/wcag-2-0-parsing-error-bookmarklet/ -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 6 April 2013 03:41, Adam Cooper <cooperad@bigpond.com> wrote: > Hi all, **** > > ** ** > > Things I heard recently that I’d really appreciate WAI IG member > comment/clarification/feedback on:**** > > **1. **There is an intention to withdraw sufficient techniques > relating to code validation from the list;**** > > **2. **That technologies for which there are no published > sufficient techniques cannot be accessibility supported;**** > > **3. **That conformance can be achieved by implementing published > sufficient techniques only, and;**** > > **4. **That ubiquitous non-web document formats used for downloads > from the web cannot conform regardless.**** > > ** ** > > Cheers,**** > > Adam **** >
Received on Saturday, 6 April 2013 07:17:00 UTC