On 18 December 2012 07:52, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca> wrote: > However, as long as these anti-JS users insist on using a tool that does > not support JavaScript, even when other viable options exist, then they are > in the "want" versus "need" category, and I do not personally believe that > WCAG 2 or any legislated requirement for equitable access is being ignored > or trampled upon. (But, as the kids say today, "haters are gonna hate") There are no anti-JS users here; no haters. Just people who are trying their best to make the web a universal, inclusive web whom all people may benefit from. Kind regards, Harry
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 09:06:03 UTC