- From: Madeleine Rothberg <madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:17:44 +0000
- To: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
If the complete raw data can't be published, could an abstracted version be used? When we write a description of a graph without access to the original data, we pick some representative points and estimate the values for those points by reading the graph in order to present a reasonable overview of the data. It seems like a shame to water down the data when the real thing is available, but it might be necessary in those cases. -Madeleine On 11/16/12 4:05 PM, "Daman Wandke" <daman@damanw.com> wrote: >Thanks for the quick responses. I have one more sticky issue. On some >of >the graphs, we are not allowed to publish the raw data. What should I do >in >those situations? > >-----Original Message----- >From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk] >Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 12:58 PM >To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org >Subject: Re: Graphs and Alt Text > >On 16/11/2012 20:47, Daman Wandke wrote: >> I am trying to figure out the best way to write alt text for line >> graphs. I am wondering what techniques others have used. Graphs are >> used to represent data quickly, but they also contain a lot of data. >> How do I balance the amount of information? I also have to find a >> technique that content editors can implement easily. The only >> technique I can think of is to include an accessible data table with the >> data. >> Looking forward to any input or suggestions. > >The traditional answer would indeed be to at least include the raw data >in a >correctly (with the right headers etc) marked up table. It would also be >useful (for all users, including those that can see the graph >itself) if there was a summary of what the graph was trying to illustrate, >I'd say. A la "With the exception of Q1 2012, sales in the past year have >been on a steady rise, closing at a total of $5bn, more than double the >previous year's closing figure of $2.3bn" ... or something. > >P >-- >Patrick H. Lauke >______________________________________________________________ >re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, >re- >+ dux, leader; see duke.] > >www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com >| >http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ >______________________________________________________________ >twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke >______________________________________________________________ >
Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 21:19:39 UTC