Sunday, 30 December 2012
Saturday, 29 December 2012
Wednesday, 19 December 2012
- Re: PDF documents and accessibility support
- Re: PDF documents and accessibility support
- Re: PDF documents and accessibility support
- Re: PDF documents and accessibility support
Tuesday, 18 December 2012
- please unsubscribe me
- Re: Remove from list
- Re: Remove from list
- Re: Remove from list
- Re: Remove from List (not me)
- RE: Remove from List
- Re: Remove from List
- Re: Remove from List
- Remove from list
- Re: Remove from List
- Re: Remove from List
- RE: Remove from List
- Remove from List
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- Re: PDF documents and accessibility support
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
Monday, 17 December 2012
- PDF documents and accessibility support
- WAI IG list use reminders
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: javascript thread
- Re: javascript thread
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- javascript thread
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
Friday, 14 December 2012
Monday, 17 December 2012
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
Sunday, 16 December 2012
Saturday, 15 December 2012
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
Friday, 14 December 2012
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
Thursday, 13 December 2012
- Call for Review: Guidance on Applying WCAG 2.0 to Non-Web ICT
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Role Attribute is a W3C Proposed Recommendation
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
- is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
Wednesday, 12 December 2012
Monday, 10 December 2012
- RE: embedded youtube HTML5 accessibility
- RE: embedded youtube HTML5 accessibility
- RE: embedded youtube HTML5 accessibility
Friday, 7 December 2012
- embedded youtube HTML5 accessibility
- RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation
- Re: Skip links and keyboard navigation
Thursday, 6 December 2012
- Accessible supplemental materials delivered with video: survey
- please remove me from mailing list asap
- JQuery UI and KnockOut (KO)
- Re: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- Remove from mailing list
- RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- Re: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- Re: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Wednesday, 5 December 2012
- RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation
- RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- Skip links and keyboard navigation
Tuesday, 4 December 2012
Friday, 30 November 2012
Thursday, 29 November 2012
Tuesday, 27 November 2012
- Achievements in Accessibility Awards nominations are open
- RE: Audio description requirements question
Monday, 26 November 2012
- Re: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
- Re: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
- Re: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
- Re: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
- RE: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
Sunday, 25 November 2012
- Re: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
- ICIEIS2013-CFP
- ICDIPC2013-CFP
- DICTAP2013-CFP
- Re: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
- Re: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
- Re: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
- Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
Friday, 23 November 2012
Thursday, 22 November 2012
- Sharing material from the "Developing with Accessibility" (DevAcc) event
- Re: Definition of a basic platform
- CFP: TAEECE2013 - Turkey - IEEE
- Definition of a basic platform
Wednesday, 21 November 2012
Tuesday, 20 November 2012
Monday, 19 November 2012
Friday, 16 November 2012
- RE: Graphs and Alt Text
- Re: Graphs and Alt Text
- Re: Graphs and Alt Text
- Re: Graphs and Alt Text
- RE: Graphs and Alt Text
- Re: Graphs and Alt Text
- Re: Graphs and Alt Text
- Graphs and Alt Text
- RE: Links and target frames
- Re: Links and target frames
- RE: Links and target frames
- Re: Links and target frames
- Links and target frames
- SC 1.3.1 Info and Relationships - does it require grouping of links?
- CFP:: CyberSec2013- Kuala Lumpur:: Malaysia
Wednesday, 14 November 2012
Sunday, 11 November 2012
- Re: changing presentation of links [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- Re: Concerns with ARIA only indicators for structural elements
Friday, 9 November 2012
- Concerns with ARIA only indicators for structural elements
- Re: changing presentation of links
- RE: changing presentation of links
- RE: changing presentation of links
Thursday, 8 November 2012
- RE: changing presentation of links [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- Re: changing presentation of links
- Re: changing presentation of links
- Re: changing presentation of links
- RE: changing presentation of links [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- Re: changing presentation of links
- RE: changing presentation of links
- RE: changing presentation of links
- RE: changing presentation of links
- RE: changing presentation of links
- RE: changing presentation of links
- changing presentation of links
- CFP:: CyberSec2013- Kuala Lumpur:: Malaysia
- Reminder: Call for Review: UAAG 2.0 Working Drafts
Wednesday, 7 November 2012
- Re: Accessible CSS / JS Bootstrap framework
- Re: Accessible CSS / JS Bootstrap framework
- RE: Accessible CSS / JS Bootstrap framework
- Re: Accessible CSS / JS Bootstrap framework
- Re: Audio description requirements question
Tuesday, 6 November 2012
- RE: Accessible CSS / JS Bootstrap framework
- Re: Accessible CSS / JS Bootstrap framework
- Re: Accessible CSS / JS Bootstrap framework
- Accessible CSS / JS Bootstrap framework
- Invitation for short contributions to Text Customization for Readability Online Symposium
- Registration Open: Text Customization for Readability Online Symposium - 19 November 2012
- Audio description requirements question
Friday, 2 November 2012
Monday, 29 October 2012
- Re: Question about SC 1.3.3 (A) Instructions
- Re: Question about SC 1.3.3 (A) Instructions
- Question about SC 1.3.3 (A) Instructions
- Re: keyboard accessible video player
- Re: Color contrast between semi-transparent colors
Friday, 26 October 2012
- CFP:: CyberSec2013- Kuala Lumpur:: Malaysia
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
Wednesday, 24 October 2012
Tuesday, 23 October 2012
- RE: keyboard accessible video player
- RE: Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
- Re: Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
- RE: Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
- Re: Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
- Re: Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
- WCAG 2.0 Swedish Authorized Translation Published
- Re: Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
- Re: Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
- Re: Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
Monday, 22 October 2012
- Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
- Re: keyboard accessible video player
- RE: keyboard accessible video player
- RE: keyboard accessible video player
- RE: keyboard accessible video player
Saturday, 20 October 2012
- RE: keyboard accessible video player
- Re: keyboard accessible video player
- Re: keyboard accessible video player
- RE: keyboard accessible video player
- RE: keyboard accessible video player
- keyboard accessible video player
Friday, 19 October 2012
Wednesday, 17 October 2012
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
Tuesday, 16 October 2012
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- RE: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- RE: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- CSUN Conference extended deadline
- RE: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
Monday, 15 October 2012
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- WCAG 2.0 Approved as ISO/IEC International Standard
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- RE: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks