Sunday, 30 December 2012
Saturday, 29 December 2012
Wednesday, 19 December 2012
- Re: PDF documents and accessibility support
 - Re: PDF documents and accessibility support
 - Re: PDF documents and accessibility support
 - Re: PDF documents and accessibility support
 
Tuesday, 18 December 2012
- please unsubscribe me
 - Re: Remove from list
 - Re: Remove from list
 - Re: Remove from list
 - Re: Remove from List (not me)
 - RE: Remove from List
 - Re: Remove from List
 - Re: Remove from List
 - Remove from list
 - Re: Remove from List
 - Re: Remove from List
 - RE: Remove from List
 - Remove from List
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - Re: PDF documents and accessibility support
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 
Monday, 17 December 2012
- PDF documents and accessibility support
 - WAI IG list use reminders
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: javascript thread
 - Re: javascript thread
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - javascript thread
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 
Friday, 14 December 2012
Monday, 17 December 2012
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 
Sunday, 16 December 2012
Saturday, 15 December 2012
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 
Friday, 14 December 2012
- Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 
Thursday, 13 December 2012
- Call for Review: Guidance on Applying WCAG 2.0 to Non-Web ICT
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Role Attribute is a W3C Proposed Recommendation
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 - is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?
 
Wednesday, 12 December 2012
Monday, 10 December 2012
- RE: embedded youtube HTML5 accessibility
 - RE: embedded youtube HTML5 accessibility
 - RE: embedded youtube HTML5 accessibility
 
Friday, 7 December 2012
- embedded youtube HTML5 accessibility
 - RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation
 - Re: Skip links and keyboard navigation
 
Thursday, 6 December 2012
- Accessible supplemental materials delivered with video: survey
 - please remove me from mailing list asap
 - JQuery UI and KnockOut (KO)
 - Re: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 - Remove from mailing list
 - RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 - Re: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 - RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 - RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 - RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 - RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 - Re: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 - RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 - RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 - RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 - RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 - RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 
Wednesday, 5 December 2012
- RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 - RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation
 - RE: Skip links and keyboard navigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 - Skip links and keyboard navigation
 
Tuesday, 4 December 2012
Friday, 30 November 2012
Thursday, 29 November 2012
Tuesday, 27 November 2012
- Achievements in Accessibility Awards nominations are open
 - RE: Audio description requirements question
 
Monday, 26 November 2012
- Re: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
 - Re: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
 - Re: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
 - Re: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
 - RE: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
 
Sunday, 25 November 2012
- Re: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
 - ICIEIS2013-CFP
 - ICDIPC2013-CFP
 - DICTAP2013-CFP
 - Re: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
 - Re: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
 - Re: Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
 - Accessible bootstrapping is now available using semantic HTML markup.
 
Friday, 23 November 2012
Thursday, 22 November 2012
- Sharing material from the "Developing with Accessibility" (DevAcc) event
 - Re: Definition of a basic platform
 - CFP: TAEECE2013 - Turkey - IEEE
 - Definition of a basic platform
 
Wednesday, 21 November 2012
Tuesday, 20 November 2012
Monday, 19 November 2012
Friday, 16 November 2012
- RE: Graphs and Alt Text
 - Re: Graphs and Alt Text
 - Re: Graphs and Alt Text
 - Re: Graphs and Alt Text
 - RE: Graphs and Alt Text
 - Re: Graphs and Alt Text
 - Re: Graphs and Alt Text
 - Graphs and Alt Text
 - RE: Links and target frames
 - Re: Links and target frames
 - RE: Links and target frames
 - Re: Links and target frames
 - Links and target frames
 - SC 1.3.1 Info and Relationships - does it require grouping of links?
 - CFP:: CyberSec2013- Kuala Lumpur:: Malaysia
 
Wednesday, 14 November 2012
Sunday, 11 November 2012
- Re: changing presentation of links [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 - Re: Concerns with ARIA only indicators for structural elements
 
Friday, 9 November 2012
- Concerns with ARIA only indicators for structural elements
 - Re: changing presentation of links
 - RE: changing presentation of links
 - RE: changing presentation of links
 
Thursday, 8 November 2012
- RE: changing presentation of links [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 - Re: changing presentation of links
 - Re: changing presentation of links
 - Re: changing presentation of links
 - RE: changing presentation of links [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 - Re: changing presentation of links
 - RE: changing presentation of links
 - RE: changing presentation of links
 - RE: changing presentation of links
 - RE: changing presentation of links
 - RE: changing presentation of links
 - changing presentation of links
 - CFP:: CyberSec2013- Kuala Lumpur:: Malaysia
 - Reminder: Call for Review: UAAG 2.0 Working Drafts
 
Wednesday, 7 November 2012
- Re: Accessible CSS / JS Bootstrap framework
 - Re: Accessible CSS / JS Bootstrap framework
 - RE: Accessible CSS / JS Bootstrap framework
 - Re: Accessible CSS / JS Bootstrap framework
 - Re: Audio description requirements question
 
Tuesday, 6 November 2012
- RE: Accessible CSS / JS Bootstrap framework
 - Re: Accessible CSS / JS Bootstrap framework
 - Re: Accessible CSS / JS Bootstrap framework
 - Accessible CSS / JS Bootstrap framework
 - Invitation for short contributions to Text Customization for Readability Online Symposium
 - Registration Open: Text Customization for Readability Online Symposium - 19 November 2012
 - Audio description requirements question
 
Friday, 2 November 2012
Monday, 29 October 2012
- Re: Question about SC 1.3.3 (A) Instructions
 - Re: Question about SC 1.3.3 (A) Instructions
 - Question about SC 1.3.3 (A) Instructions
 - Re: keyboard accessible video player
 - Re: Color contrast between semi-transparent colors
 
Friday, 26 October 2012
- CFP:: CyberSec2013- Kuala Lumpur:: Malaysia
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 
Wednesday, 24 October 2012
Tuesday, 23 October 2012
- RE: keyboard accessible video player
 - RE: Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
 - Re: Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
 - RE: Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
 - Re: Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
 - Re: Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
 - WCAG 2.0 Swedish Authorized Translation Published
 - Re: Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
 - Re: Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
 - Re: Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
 
Monday, 22 October 2012
- Contrast ratio 4.5:1 applies to rollovers?
 - Re: keyboard accessible video player
 - RE: keyboard accessible video player
 - RE: keyboard accessible video player
 - RE: keyboard accessible video player
 
Saturday, 20 October 2012
- RE: keyboard accessible video player
 - Re: keyboard accessible video player
 - Re: keyboard accessible video player
 - RE: keyboard accessible video player
 - RE: keyboard accessible video player
 - keyboard accessible video player
 
Friday, 19 October 2012
Wednesday, 17 October 2012
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 
Tuesday, 16 October 2012
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - RE: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - RE: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - CSUN Conference extended deadline
 - RE: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 
Monday, 15 October 2012
- Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - WCAG 2.0 Approved as ISO/IEC International Standard
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - RE: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Re: Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
 - Access Keys as a means to passing 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks