- From: Jan Eric Hellbusch <hellbusch@2bweb.de>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:57:03 +0200
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi all, thanks for the input. After reading the replies I think I should put my question differently: When a link in a menu bar is deactivated, because the link would otherwise point to the current page, do any users feel the page is broken or semantically defect? Considerations: * the menu is on a static page * See also Example #3 on http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/G128.html * text (i.e. "current page") is additionally being added to the menu item * the menu items are designed to highlight current items (also in contrast mode) The point is, that * some people (as Andrew) ask, why should somebody want to reload the (static) page and start from the top, and * other people say, it is a question of usability/expectations to be able to reload the page from a menu item pointing to the current page. Somehow the answer to the above question seems vague. I personally would deactivate links, but at the same time I have no straight-forward arguments other than what Andrew has already written. And, if screenreader usage and highlighting have been optimized, is it still a question of accessibility, or of usability, of both or none? Any more thoughts on the matter? Regards, Jan
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2012 07:57:30 UTC