- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:37:47 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: > Since it is not good to post text over a pattern -- or photo -- the best > would be either to not do it or to halo the text with white/very light. > In my experience, when text is overlaid in pictures, in print, it is done when the publisher doesn't really care about the text except as a way of getting people to the advertising. The other reason I think it is done, is as a copy protection measure, but again that is to avoid people copying the editorial and distributing it without the advertising. I would suggest that: 1) unless the designer can guarantee meeting the colour contrast everywhere within say about 1 en around the characters, they should not put text intended to be read over pictures; 2) unless the image is lacking in high spatial frequencies, the required colour contrast should be significantly larger than for flat colours - text over forest leaves is much more difficult to read than over a constant tone of a similar colour to the leaves. Basically, if this usage is developing, the colour contrast rules need enhancing, rather than having exceptions made. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2012 20:38:16 UTC