- From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 15:24:36 -0400
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
[Patrick wrote] > And worth noting that the text says "includes text that is...", meaning > that it's not just limited to those elements/constructs listed. So I don't > quite see a DIV being a clear failure, just because it's not mentioned in > the example. If the link and text were in the same DIV element and not separated by other content - then yes it could be conformant. However, if it was in an adjacent DIV and there was no linkage with ARIA in my opinion it would not conform because there would be no programmatic relationship that could automatically be consistently determined . There are certainly limitations on this approach - for example, having the link and text in the same body tag would not conform. Jonathan -----Original Message----- From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 12:53 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: Programmatic association of generic link text On 04/09/2012 16:40, Jonathan Avila wrote: > "Example: In HTML, information that is programmatically determinable > from a link in English includes text that is in the same paragraph, > list, or table cell as the link or in a table header cell that is > associated with the table cell that contains the link." And worth noting that the text says "includes text that is...", meaning that it's not just limited to those elements/constructs listed. So I don't quite see a DIV being a clear failure, just because it's not mentioned in the example. -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ ______________________________________________________________ twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke ______________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 19:27:07 UTC