- From: Brian Cragun <cragun@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:28:19 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF74F5E13E.4960EA72-ON86257A5C.007A1F5C-86257A5C.007B60EC@us.ibm.com>
Wayne, I understand exactly what you're saying.. Thus my purpose is asking whether it was required or recommended. Regards, Brian Brian Cragun IBM AbilityLab Consultant IBM Master Inventor IBM Research Tel: 720-663-2801 E-mail: cragun@us.ibm.com From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com> To: Brian Cragun/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS, Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Date: 08/16/2012 05:09 PM Subject: Re: SV: SV: SV: in-page text-to-speech If Sweden or any other country requires in-page text-to-speech or in-page text-enlargement then this is a major departure from standards harmonization. It really opens the door to inaccessible sites that provide inadequate accessibility support. Put your effort in WCAG 2.0 Level AA compliance. Text-to-speech works on a WCAG 2.0 Level AA site, and text-only enlargement is available to a greater extent than any in-page enlargement provides. We really don't need to invent unnecessary jobs for developers. In the US there is absolutely no such requirement. Also, if you have a site with in-page accommodation that fails WCAG the sight is inaccessible. Wayne On 8/16/12, Brian Cragun <cragun@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Thank you, Morten, > > This is very helpful. > > Regards, > > Brian > > > > > > Brian Cragun > IBM AbilityLab Consultant > IBM Master Inventor > IBM Research > Tel: 720-663-2801 > E-mail: cragun@us.ibm.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: "Morten Tollefsen" <morten@medialt.no> > To: Brian Cragun/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS, > Cc: "Adam Cooper" <cooperad@bigpond.com>, "Harry Loots" > <harry.loots@ieee.org>, "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, > <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > Date: 08/16/2012 02:43 AM > Subject: SV: SV: SV: in-page text-to-speech > > > > Hi! > > I got the following answer from Rudolph Brynn (Standards Norway): > > ---------- > 1) These are required for "public institutions". I assume that means > government, including schools. Obviously it is not required but > recommended for business. Does the requirement extend to any other > entities? > > It is primarily for public institutions, meaning on government, county and > municipal levels. But also recommendations for private enterprises, I > would assume in particular those in touch with the public authorities in > public procurement contracts. > > 2) I understand these to be requirements. What happens if the > requirements are not met. Are there laws associated with the > requirements? Or are these more like guidelines? > > They are guidelines for public authorities, not legal acts nor standards. > They have no legal effect as Sweden has not an accessibility act like > Norway but follow the EU regulations on public procurements, which > requires design for all to be part of planning/technical specifications > concerning tenders. Only the Swedish standardisation body, SIS may publish > regular standards, be they national (SS), European (EN) or international > (ISO). As in Norway. > > > 3) Can you help me understand what the difference is between Priority 1 > and Priority 2? Is Priority 1 mandatory, and Priority 2 optional? > > I understand it is a matter of importance, you should definitely implement > the Priority 1, then P2 and then P3 - but refer to the other answers. > > > 4) Further when I look at the requirement for TTS on R11, it uses the > (translated word) Recommendation for TTS, instead of requirement. Can you > help me understand how mandatory the TTS requirement is? > > Like the other parts of the guideline, a recommendation. Only if a Swedish > legal act refers to the guidelines/standards related to them, we talk of > requirements. > ---------- > > Priorities: What Rudolph writes above is probably correct. The only > explanation I've found is: > "Prioritet 1 till 3. Riktlinjerna har getts en prioritet från 1 till 3. Om > ni behöver prioritera börja med de riktlinjer som har prioritet 1. > Därefter kan riktlinjerna med prioritet 2 och 3 hanteras." > My translation: > Priority 1 to 3 The guidelines have been given priorities from 1 to 3. If > you have to prioritize start with the priority 1 guidelines and thereafter > continue with the priority 2 and 3 guidelines. > > - Morten > > Fra: Brian Cragun [mailto:cragun@us.ibm.com] > Sendt: 15. august 2012 15:30 > Til: Morten Tollefsen > Kopi: Adam Cooper; Harry Loots; Patrick H. Lauke; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Emne: Re: SV: SV: in-page text-to-speech > > Morton, > > Thanks for the links. With Google Translate, (and some very rusty Danish > skills) I think I understand most of this. May I ask some clarifying > questions? (To help me understand detail that is not quite coming through > the translation. ) > > 1) These are required for "public institutions". I assume that means > government, including schools. Obviously it is not required but > recommended for business. Does the requirement extend to any other > entities? > > 2) I understand these to be requirements. What happens if the > requirements are not met. Are there laws associated with the > requirements? Or are these more like guidelines? > > 3) Can you help me understand what the difference is between Priority 1 > and Priority 2? Is Priority 1 mandatory, and Priority 2 optional? > > 4) Further when I look at the requirement for TTS on R11, it uses the > (translated word) Recommendation for TTS, instead of requirement. Can you > help me understand how mandatory the TTS requirement is? > Regards, > > Brian > > ________________________________________ > > Brian Cragun > IBM AbilityLab Consultant > IBM Master Inventor > IBM Research > Tel: 720-663-2801 > E-mail: cragun@us.ibm.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________ > > > > > > > From: "Morten Tollefsen" <morten@medialt.no> > To: Brian Cragun/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS, > Cc: "Adam Cooper" <cooperad@bigpond.com>, "Harry Loots" > <harry.loots@ieee.org>, "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, > <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > Date: 08/15/2012 03:22 AM > Subject: SV: SV: in-page text-to-speech > ________________________________________ > > > > Hi, Brian! > > Of course, here it is: > http://www.webbriktlinjer.se/ > As far as I have been able to figure out this is a standard. > > I’ve commented a little bit, but this is in Norwegian and is therefore > probably not very interesting/useful: > http://medialt.no/vgledningen-fr-webbutveckling/1175.aspx > > BR: Morten Tollefsen > www.medialt.no, +47 908 99 305 > > Fra: Brian Cragun [mailto:cragun@us.ibm.com] > Sendt: 14. august 2012 15:45 > Til: Morten Tollefsen > Kopi: Adam Cooper; Harry Loots; Patrick H. Lauke; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Emne: Re: SV: in-page text-to-speech > > Morten, > > Can you please provide a reference to the Swedish standard you speak of? > And, is it just a recommendation or a standard? > Regards, > > Brian > > > ________________________________________ > > Brian Cragun > IBM AbilityLab Consultant > IBM Master Inventor > IBM Research > Tel: 720-663-2801 > E-mail: cragun@us.ibm.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________ > > > > > > > From: "Morten Tollefsen" <morten@medialt.no> > To: "Harry Loots" <harry.loots@ieee.org>, "Adam Cooper" > <cooperad@bigpond.com>, > Cc: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, > <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > Date: 08/14/2012 05:19 AM > Subject: SV: in-page text-to-speech > ________________________________________ > > > > > Hi, Harry! > > I totally agree. > > In some new Swedish guidelines for web developments (only public > authorities have to follow these) accessibility is one of the categories. > The first guideline say: follow WCAG 2. The other 43 accessibility > guidelines cover forms, languages, links and other things. In one of the > guidelines it is stated that talking websites are required! I was quite > surprised when I read this! If I counted correctly, 33 of the 44 > guidelines in the accessibility section are also found under usability☺! > > Morten > > >
Attachments
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 22:28:58 UTC