- From: Jamal Mazrui <empower@smart.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:30:28 -0400
- To: Ramón Corominas <listas@ramoncorominas.com>
- CC: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
As a screen reader user, I personally prefer there to be a single-page version of a document, even if that means many links. Among other benefits, it allows one to do global searches of the document, navigate by heading or other element across the whole content, and check one's relative position as a percentage so one knows how much as been traversed and how much remains. It is fine if another HTML version is also available that splits the document into separate pages by section. If only one version is to be available, however, I think the single-page version provides the most overall usability. From my conversations with other blind people, I think this perspective is widely held among us. If I do not want to hear references to page elements such as "link" or "heading" as I'm reading, I can always copy and paste the page into an editor and read the plain text there instead. Jamal On 8/10/2012 7:37 AM, Ramón Corominas wrote: > WCAG 2.0 Recommendation has 547 links. I guess that more complex > Recommendations have far higher number of links. Are they "inaccessible"? > > Regards, > Ramón.
Received on Friday, 10 August 2012 12:31:20 UTC