- From: <accessys@smart.net>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 13:19:06 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk>
- cc: W3C WAI ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
a 21 page document with 5 pages of links and 21 pages of foot notes. some of my college proffesors would have been impressed but I think there has to be a better way. very confuseing though trying to read it. interesting article once I figured out how to read it, but couldn't there have been a tree structure. (footnotes) (links) then click thru to the items ??? Bob On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Andy Mabbett wrote: > Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 18:07:32 +0100 > From: Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk> > To: W3C WAI ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > Subject: Re: Limit on the links in a page > Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:08:46 +0000 > Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > > On 9 August 2012 15:06, <accessys@smart.net> wrote: > >> my mind boggles at why so many links. > > Tables of data; indices, references/ citations, lists, whole-year > calendars, etc. > > For example, there are around 170 in the 'Notes' section of today's > "featured article" on the English-language Wikipedia: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Ganga_Dynasty#Notes > > and far more than 200 in the whole article. > > -- > Andy Mabbett > @pigsonthewing > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk >
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2012 18:05:56 UTC