- From: Philippe Vayssière <philippe@alsacreations.fr>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:31:14 +0200
- To: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi, Could you please provide the HTML code of the enclosing link? Is this a named anchor : <a name="name_attribute_deprecated_but_still_used" id="name_attribute_deprecated_but_still_used"><img src="path/image.png" alt=""></a> or a link to some page : <a href="something.php"><img src="path/image.png" alt=""></a> For example, the Accessiweb checklist, which is based on WCAG 2.0, excludes "a" elements without an "href" attribute from the links that should have text (or alternative text) as content : http://www.braillenet.org/accessibilite/referentiel-aw21-en/index.php#crit-6-6 (you can follow links to the glossary for more details). Regards, Ph. Vayssière Le 10/07/2012 17:39, PJ Mancuso a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > Wanted to say thanks for the previous help received and that I have > been making headway auditing the webpages that have been tasked to me. > Question about anchor images and alt text. I received this as some of > the known problems: > > *Success Criteria 1.1.1 Non-text Content (A)* > > Check 7: Image used as anchor is missing valid Alt text. > <http://achecker.ca/checker/suggestion.php?id=7> > > *Repair: *Add Alt text that identifies the purpose or function of the > image. > > /Line 84, Column 13/: > > <img src="/jjj/img/lp/pixel.gif" class="d_nb_s" alt="" /> > > The image itself is 1px and is used as an anchor for a link I believe. > In this situation is alt text really useful? I have read somewhere > that in this particular situation anchor images shouldn't even be > used. What exactly is the proper procedure here? > > > Any explanation would be greatly appreciated so I can pass on to the > programmers. I hope this wasn't too confusing. > > > Regards, > > -PJ >
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2012 16:31:59 UTC