- From: Samantha Bird <samanthazoe360@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:13:52 +0100
- To: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net, Joe Chidzik <joe.chidzik@abilitynet.org.uk>, morten@medialt.no
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CABu3AMh=L+kxLCQq74t8Em2i_5rNUtnfUsvJdW1fcO-Ok+97sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you all for your great feedback - you gave me the answer I was hoping to get! I have some good reasons to push for ensuring all our products are accessibility friendly regardless of time scales etc. Much appreciated Joe, Morten and Deborah :) What a great mailing list this is ... Morten, on a different note, I would be very interested in discussing the tools you use on a daily basis so i can get a further understanding of the tools available to the general public. I won't lie, 25 years in programming when reliant on accessible tools is rather impressive. Thanks. On 29 June 2012 14:49, <deborah.kaplan@suberic.net> wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jun 2012, Samantha Bird wrote: > >> I wanted to get a few opinions as to if a testing tool would need to be >> Accessible or would this be unnecessary work? >> > > Samantha, > > Here are some questions to ask people at your office who are > arguing against making the testing tool accessible. > > Do you believe, either legally or ethically or simply because of > sound business practice, that software that is used in places > of business should be accessible to all employees? Is your > employer a large enough company to be governed by the ADA's > regulations itself? Would your company ever be delivering > services to companies which are bound by regulations which > require all contracted firms to follow ADA or similar guidelines? > Are you positive that the perfect employee is not waiting right > around the corner, who happens to be somebody who relies on JAWS > or ZoomText or NaturallySpeaking to interact with computers? > Have all of the current employees of your employer been granted a > dispensation from the universe promising that none of you will > ever get a mobility or vision disability? > > Accessibility testing tools are business software just like > Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat, and the exact same constraints > apply as to why these tools should be accessible. In fact, the > constraints are even more relevant than for normal software, > because the accessibility testing and programming community > disproportionately represents professionals with disabilities. > It's actually extremely likely that the perfect employee for your > next corporate opening is right around the corner, and happens to > be somebody who relies on JAWS or ZoomText or NaturallySpeaking to > do her work. > > Besides which, you guys are obviously experts who know how to do > it right. You might as well. :-) > > -Deborah Kaplan > Accessibility Team Colead > Dreamwidth Studios LLC >
Received on Friday, 29 June 2012 15:14:28 UTC