- From: Lauren Colton <lauren@gravityworksdesign.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:33:17 -0400
- To: "Stewart, Ian [USA]" <Stewart_Ian@bah.com>
- Cc: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAYwOVDf39MJtYxhGEAiPvMP-oAv28O2aU7kMNCexJoH2vxg9A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ian, You could potentially keep the proper semantics (H2, then H3) with the desired style (H2, then H4) by having a CSS class of h4. So then you can use <h3 class="h4">. Best, Lauren On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Stewart, Ian [USA] <Stewart_Ian@bah.com>wrote: > All,**** > > ** ** > > My name’s Ian Stewart, I’m a GWT/Drupal developer and new to > accessibility, but I’ve done extensive research lately in order to make one > of my projects as accessible as possible.**** > > ** ** > > Right now, I’m confronted with an interesting issue regarding heading > levels. Heading levels, from my point of view, have always been primarily > a visual style cue. Often an <h4> works better for CSS inheritance reasons > than an <h3>, for no reason other than visual style.**** > > ** ** > > Recently, our accessibility tester approached me with an interesting > point. She suggested that the reader is expecting heading levels to make > sense as if the page is a linearized document, with each depth representing > a consistent level of detail. What do you all make of this statement? > Does jumping from an <h2> to an <h4> on a page for stylistic reasons truly > lessen the intuitiveness of the page for a screen reader? Is subclassing > an <h3> to fit my style needs worth having <h2>s always followed by <h3>s? > **** > > ** ** > > Thanks for your thoughts, I found it an interesting question.**** > > ** ** > > Sincerely,**** > > ** ** > > Ian**** > -- Lauren Colton Information Architect & Editor http://www.gravityworksdesign.com Office: 517.481.2218 Cell: 517.410.0774 Fax: 517.481.3778
Received on Friday, 25 May 2012 19:33:47 UTC