- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 12:07:49 +0200
- To: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
On Wed, 09 May 2012 11:18:07 +0200, Patrick H. Lauke
<redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote:
> if the functionality is available, but only if users have a particular
> browser/extension/AT, is it a pass or a fail? The argument seems to be
> that it should work everywhere, regardless of what software the user
> has. Taking it to extremes, does that mean a site should be usable by a
> visually impaired/blind user when they're not using a screen reader?
> Should we then require sites to be self-voicing? A strawman, admittedly,
> but this goes to the heart of "accessibility supported".
Right.
It's pretty much necessary to explain what the user requirements are when
rating a site...
cheers
--
Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan noen norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 10:08:29 UTC