- From: Kazuhito Kidachi <kazuhito@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 10:57:24 +0900
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > On 09/05/2012 02:08, Kazuhito Kidachi wrote: > On the other hand, users that DO rely on keyboard-only navigation should > also be using tools that make it easier for them to do so. This sounds like usability issue, rather than accessibility issue. I know that there's overlap between accessibility and usability, and SC 2.4.1 seems close to usability to me. That's another reason why I feel level AA is more suitable for the SC. > I believe the important part is that it's technically/programmatically > possible for users to navigate the structure of a page in a sensible and > easy manner. Not all browsers/tools/AT will be able to, but as long as > there's at least one tool that does support sensible navigation in this > fashion, I'd argue that the SC is satisfied. IMHO of course. Well, do you think web pages with proper headings/landmarks can comply with 2.4.1, without providing skip links, because keyboard-only users can choose Opera browser (or, Firefox with Heading Navigation Greasemonkey User Script)? Regards, Kazuhito -- Kazuhito Kidachi mailto:kazuhito@gmail.com
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 01:57:53 UTC