- From: GuruPrasad Sira <guruprasad.sira@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 07:57:23 +0530
- To: Mag Leahy <magleahy@gmail.com>
- Cc: WAI Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAC7AXAEe6O54oBV=2gP3x-h+7Py5rN6jFonkwfRM2+jcoLgJuA@mail.gmail.com>
Mag, By suggesting Ajax, I was referring to the same technique you are recommending as JQuery and "JS to provide cool effects" - http://www.w3schools.com/jquery/jquery_ajax.asp. Regards, Guruprasad Sira On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Mag Leahy <magleahy@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry Guruprasad, I didn't understand how Ajax is an alternative to Flash? > > Mag > > On 26 Dec 2011, at 13:08, Guruprasad Sira <guruprasad.sira@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Meliha, > If that piece of Flash is what you want to be addressed, I would recommend > you to try an alternate with Ajax which will give you the same effect and > you can make it accessible. > > Talking about a parallel site, you may rather consider giving a text > alternative to the inaccessible content. Providing another completely > accessibility compliant site as an option may not be required in your case. > Either provide text alternative or implement Ajax based component. > > Finally, if you still decide to go with 2 sites option - which has > disadvantages as Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis has rightly said - try better > labelling than "inaccessible site". It is only a portion of the site > content that is inaccessible there. > > Hope it helps. > > Regards, > Guruprasad Sira > > Meliha Yenilmez <melihayenilmez@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hello all, > > I work in a “Ministry of Family and Social Policies<http://tureng.com/search/ministry%20of%20family%20and%20social%20policies> > ” in Turkey . My head office does legislations for disability and old > people. They often look our web site therefore we want to make our website > more accessibile. However, there is a little problem. Accessibility is new > concept in Turkey . When someone look at the web site, maybe they don’t > like it because they are used to flash version web sites. > > Any way, > > > Our web site is www.aile.gov.tr . We've used Flash for our ministry's > news on the middle of the page. She wants to see that flash news on the web > site but we don't convert that flash for accessibile.Therefore, we decide > making 2 web sites. > > When someone click www.aile.gov.tr , he'll see accessible website which > has not designed yet. If he doesn't want to surf with inaccessible web > site, he click the button [Button’s name is” Click here for > non-accessible web site”] and then, he surfs with flash version of website. > (I drew in attachment) > > When we do like that, is it accessible or not? And my other question is " > When we do like that, is it disability discrimination or not?" > > If that is not accessible or include discrimination, why? Because I > present her excuses why we don’t use both website. > > > Thanks a lot. > > *Meliha Yenilmez* > > >
Received on Tuesday, 27 December 2011 02:27:51 UTC