- From: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:59:40 -0500
- To: wed@csulb.edu
- Cc: Liz Hunter <lduncan@siu.edu>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Ensuring that Web content works with assistive technologies (generally expected to be in use by the target population) is required for ensuring the Web page is WCAG 2 compliant. Some attributes / elements are not adequately supported by browsers / assistive technologies even though the specs documents their accessibility properties. Well one should employ a combination of techniques to identify accessibility barriers including testing with evaluation tools, assistive technologies and browser combinations, and of course by users who routinely depend on assistive technology for computer access and who know accessibility specs and Web technologies. Source code review is also a vital skill to say why something is a problem and suggest context-specific fixes. Sailesh Panchang www.deque.com On 12/9/11, Wayne Dick <wed@csulb.edu> wrote: > Dear James, > > I think testing with a screen reader is not very useful. The > suggestion of using a free and easy to use reader is best, because it > does not involve a lot of learning time. > > Your time is better spent learning an evaluation tool, especially the > manual evaluation parts. Screen readers will let you know if some > people who are blind can use your site. They will give you almost no > information about how well your site will support the needs of people > with low vision, the majority of people with visual impairments. > > So spend your time studying the WCAG Guidlines and the "how to meet" > descriptions. Learn your WAI ARIA. Learn a good evaluation tool and > how to do manual evaluation effectively. > > Remember, when you meet WCAG and WAI ARIA, and a screen reader cannot > read your site, your page is isn't the problem... the screen reader > just has a bug. > > Wayne Dick > >
Received on Monday, 12 December 2011 01:24:50 UTC