- From: G F Mueden <gfmueden@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:56:40 -0400
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
This is one of five out of 24 emals that disabled my accessibility setting for choice of font Can't read it or what I am typing G F Mueden ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 1:56 PM Subject: Re: Null alt tags for decorative images - Technique H67 | On 03/11/2011 17:19, Jonathan Avila wrote: | > While many images are decorative I believe authors and should step back | > and ask themselves why they included the image. If the image conveys a | > meaning like a smiling receptionist – that does convey something about | > the company. | | Which I'd convey in the friendly, welcoming tone of voice of the body | copy of the page, rather than with an alt="Smiling receptionist". | | > Another image of people of different ethnic backgrounds | > may imply the company is diverse. These may be important factors to | > convey to people viewing the site and getting people to buy your products. | | Again, tone and description. There's also widespread use of generic | stock photos (alt="Closeup of a firm handshake between two | businesspeople in suits", alt="Young woman sprawled on the bed, looking | intently at her laptop", etc) which I'd definitely say are visual fluff. | | But yes, it's very difficult to have a hard and fast, black or white | answer. It's up to the individual context, intent, and so on. | | P | -- | Patrick H. Lauke | ______________________________________________________________ | re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively | [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] | | www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk | http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | ______________________________________________________________ | twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke | ______________________________________________________________ |
Received on Friday, 4 November 2011 00:02:28 UTC