- From: <accessys@smart.net>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:16:08 -0400 (EDT)
- To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- cc: "'EmbedPlus'" <ext@embedplus.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
we've been arguing since the web was a single spider. I made it clear that I was testing with lowest common denominator. I didn't say I routinely run lynx, but many do. have firefox and all the others you mention...plus ORCA and EmacSpeak > Open-Source soap-box and rail your fist at the audacity of software www.fsf.org > That truly depends on how you a) measure "access" and accessible, and b) > what your expectations of web content is. > > 25 years ago (when there was no "web"; the World Wide Web celebrating its > 20th anniversary this month - August 6, 1991*) you had text-based systems > such as UseNet or IRC, but history and science march on, and today we have was using arapanet via Westinghouse Aerospace in 1973.....on a UNIVAC 1108 nuff said. Bob
Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2011 02:17:29 UTC